AWKWARD ZOMBIE

Everything's a possibility. That's the issue we have to deal with since both investigative roles were killed nights one and two. It's why I added the last part, that I wouldn't really blame you for lynching me regardless, but you'd feel silly when it comes up I was innocent the whole time. I said my piece half to try and convince everyone, and half to cover my own booty. Now you can't say I didn't...because I did.

He's covering his booty! He must be Scum! KILL HIM!!!! (I'm jesting)

But what are we going to do now? Keep looking for people trying to lay low? Or for people who did weird votes?

Well, luckily, we know crisp was mafia, so we have her posts to go off of when it comes to possible mafia reactions. With that, I'm gonna refrain from getting too involved in the picking process since I'm currently one of the ones on the block (ironically because I got too involved in the picking process).

Hes not my alt! I swear!

Also.
Remember menas I once was...
A

Cipher...Peon...

(only mafia members will get this. Haw)

Ahh! Zombie!

............who're your accomplices zombie?!

ZOMBIE!: Bad Guy.


You say lynches don't make you pop flyin',
TOWN, MAFIA, HRNNGGG!

Okay, so here are my thoughts on the votes from yesterday since we've gotten more people posting:

Voted for Slob:
Need Runes4 (likely innocent, first tried to random lynch Crisp)
D-vid (seems to think it's a long shot to use these votes for lynching and is open to the possibility that Reyo is framing himself to make it too obvious of a lynch. Unsure who to lynch despite lynching town yesterday. Uncertain siding)
Guyperson (remained kinda neutral, nothing really to go on)
Tammerath (one neutral post, hold the onions)
AngelicSongx (has said nothing since the day started, was kinda pushy on getting a lynch going and used "quiet" reasoning to lynch Slob. Willing to jump on any bandwagon on Day 2.)
Cori (knowledgeable and helpful, seems to be suspicious of Runes and Alec)
Reyo (iffy: voted to kill an innocent and the person who accused him was almost killed, but could easily be set up. Kinda seems dumb to how Crisp could have died and the idea that the Gunmaker could have been shot, but might be playing dumb)

Voted:
TurboPunz (voted for Reyo. Innocent, killed Crisp and was hooked one night.)
SaintCrazy - Tammerath (likely innocent, reasoning makes sense)

Didn't vote:
Kamak (hooked night 1)
Alec (claims to have wanted to vote, though we don't know who for. First to claim Slob's quietness was suspect)
Ungeheuer (Has been very quiet. Last to vote No Lynch on day 1. Didn't post Day 2 or 3.)

Out of the 12 people remaining, 4 are mafia, 1 is the doctor, and 1 is the gunsmith. If we assume the 3 in green are innocent (and the one in blue who is likely innocent IMO), that means we have an effective total of 8 individuals to pick from that could be mafia.

I'd like other people's input on this though, anything I might have overlooked or you don't agree with in my analysis?

8-9 individuals to choose from* whoops, forgot to change that when I downgraded Saint to blue instead of green.

That's what he claims at least. Though if it was wrong the real person would have spoken up if it wasn't one of the people who barely talk either way.

I feel real bad about tonight.

Not sure if the doctor could help me.

I'm not playing dumb. The only dumb thing I did was make the suggestion that the gunsmith should out himself, and that's because I didn't think of the possibility that the mafia could have a gun to then shoot the gunsmith. If you're talking. About the issue of crisps's death, it's because I though saint's comment shortly after the da y started meant someone had to die even with a defense shot.

I know this just works against me, but......no!

Also, the sheer amount I've been active makes no sense for playing dumb.

Still, I added it there as a possibility.

I believe it's more likely that you're innocent, but there's a lot of shit to consider here.

I have a couple of people I'm keeping an eye on though, but I don't have much proof to back myself up.

Fair enough.

For the record, I was planning on voting for, if we were going through with the random lynch, Ungeheuer or Cynic, the two members I posted as being inactive in the thread, or, if evidence was presented, jump on a lynch bandwagon.

...Does anybody care to explain why we chose Cynic instead of Ungeheuer? Since both were equally inactive, IIRC.