AWKWARD ZOMBIE

i'll jump on the bandwagon and say lynch turbo

As a professional investigator I'm gonna wait for some hints.

Please notice how I didn't say "proof".

Wait, didn't Darkin star the votes last time? I want to lynch Darkin. He started the lynch for Runes (innocent), he voted for Noff (although, anyone would've been dumb to not vote for him, even the mafia), he voted off his best friend Nefarious (innocent), he voted to lynch Sol Reaper (band wagon, but still, no mafia would want to initiate a vote so early in the game (Day 2)), and he wanted to lynch Dragoon (innocent).

Most of his votes were for innocent people, and most of the game he hardly said anything. The only person he voted for that wasn't innocent was Noffletoff. He was destined for the slammer, so voting no lynch or doing anything other than posing as a townie would be suspicious. It's weird that Darkin suddenly started getting really into voting against someone now.

Whew. Went through pretty much the entire thread for all this, hope this is a good hint.

Ya done well, rookie.
Darkin's gotta go dark

As a defense attorney's assistant I have to keep an eye out for these things!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp3RaRI_sQA

Oh come now, you honestly think that's the cincher? Look around, almost every single one of those times, it was for a good reason. Off the top of my head, Sol was looking mighty suspicious when I pointed the finger at him. Nefarious was getting far too vote pop flyin', it made him look insanely hellbent on offing all the innocents. I can't refute your point on noff, anyone with eyes would vote him. I can't honestly come up with any reason for Dragoon, other than it was better at that point to vote SOMEONE than to vote no lynch. As for Runes, quite frankly at this point, we're all getting a bit antsy. And who's to say that you aren't the guilty one yourself? If you're gonna go around blaming people, I want justifications for ever vote you've made, other than the obvious one for Noff.

Admit it, you've got nothing on me, and it's gonna stay that way until you come up with something a little stronger than that.

I'm looking back on posts too. What Angelic says is solid and Angelic hasn't done much to appear scummy (being very hesitant on voting to lynch), though of course that's not solid proof, they could just be very careful mafia (the most suspicious thing I found was that Angelic got the final vote on Neffy). I'd like to hold off on voting until I can check out Bacon and Turbo.

i'm really starting to regret the theming

Darkin Nefarious wasn't even being suspicious. I've already said my reasoning why multiple times.

Also, I love how you seem to be ignoring the fact that Turbo was quick to vote off Nef as well.

You're the target of focus here. Diversionary tactic failed.

Couldn't I use the same on you, considering the target WAS on Turbo?

Sure

Except the fact that I didn't actually change the focus, and I've already given solid proof that I'm innocent sided.