AWKWARD ZOMBIE

usually not funny
It is currently Tue Sep 16, 2025 4:27 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 188 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:32 am
Posts: 4
While 'ise' endings have more or less gained acceptance in British English, 'ize' still more accurately reflects etymology and is strongly preferred by the Oxford English Dictionary.

Fuck popping in just to talk about WoW, try joining a comic forum for the sole purpose of wordnerding. OhgodI'msoalone


(No really guys I was totally going to join anyway. Maybe. Probably.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: T is for troll.
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:30 pm
Posts: 5446
Location: End of Time, chilling with Spekkio
Well at least you came. You get an E for effort.

_________________
mah tumblargh


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 6:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 12:12 pm
Posts: 12220
Location: Thinking.
Corver wrote:
While 'ise' endings have more or less gained acceptance in British English, 'ize' still more accurately reflects etymology and is strongly preferred by the Oxford English Dictionary.

I'm old skool - don't make me get Shakespearian on your booty!

Image

English spelling is all over the place anyway. My dictionary does spell apologize with a 'z', but then it spells exercise with an 's'. To my ear - exercise has more of a 'z' sound at the end.

I really don't care that much, my English is better than average, but I still confuse words like 'where' and 'were'.

Jeezus H! Even 'Shakesperian' has rival spellings - 'Shakespearian' and 'Shakespearean'.

_________________
donotdelete.deviantart.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:32 am
Posts: 4
Haha, yes. No worries - not a grammar/spelling nazi here, just an incurable nerd. Standardization is only truly important in formal writing, where stilting the natural evolution of language ensures readability for generations to come. ...I've just developed the most bizarre pet peeve against seeing the 'ize' ending referred to as American, and.. well. I am terribly impulsive in early mornings.

Somehow I forgot to mention up there how much I liked your edit up there. Apparently mornings make me a little retarded, too. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 10:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 18, 2009 8:34 pm
Posts: 607
This comic reminded me of when I was beating up on the sandbag in Brawl. Just for the "damage delivered" rank.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 7:04 am
Posts: 84
Location: Britain
Leoj wrote:
Bacon wrote:
Leoj wrote:
Anonymouse wrote:
Leoj wrote:
It was a good edit, very good, except that you spelled apologize with an S. Its not apologise its apologize!

Grammar/Spelling Nazi strikes again!

Actually, no. Apologise is just the British spelling of the word "apologize." It's the difference between "color" and "colour." Neither is correct, and which one you use just depends where you're from.


Don't you know? American is the correct language and all others fail and need to get with the program.


Nope, it's just you.


I think my friends at Fox News would agree with me.


I'm not even American and I know that having someone at Fox News agree with you is going to make it less true quicker than more so.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:42 pm
Posts: 2
Raylax wrote:
Leoj wrote:
Bacon wrote:
Leoj wrote:
Anonymouse wrote:
Leoj wrote:
It was a good edit, very good, except that you spelled apologize with an S. Its not apologise its apologize!

Grammar/Spelling Nazi strikes again!

Actually, no. Apologise is just the British spelling of the word "apologize." It's the difference between "color" and "colour." Neither is correct, and which one you use just depends where you're from.


Don't you know? American is the correct language and all others fail and need to get with the program.


Nope, it's just you.


I think my friends at Fox News would agree with me.


I'm not even American and I know that having someone at Fox News agree with you is going to make it less true quicker than more so.


"more quickly"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:32 pm
Posts: 9701
Location: Traveling the World
That was an excellent first post.

_________________
Image
Myk wrote:
i love yaya

The incomparable princess brothel wrote:
don't oppress my
gay bulges


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 4:01 pm 
Offline
fluffduck
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 3:52 pm
Posts: 4544
Location: not where you are
Raylax wrote:
Leoj wrote:
Bacon wrote:
Leoj wrote:
Anonymouse wrote:
Leoj wrote:
It was a good edit, very good, except that you spelled apologize with an S. Its not apologise its apologize!

Grammar/Spelling Nazi strikes again!

Actually, no. Apologise is just the British spelling of the word "apologize." It's the difference between "color" and "colour." Neither is correct, and which one you use just depends where you're from.


Don't you know? American is the correct language and all others fail and need to get with the program.


Nope, it's just you.


I think my friends at Fox News would agree with me.


I'm not even American and I know that having someone at Fox News agree with you is going to make it less true quicker than more so.
You dolt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 7:04 am
Posts: 84
Location: Britain
...Why do I feel I've either hit a nerve or missed an obvious joke by some miles? Either way, sorry, whatever I did ^^;


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 2:17 am
Posts: 3185
Location: Kansas
Raylax wrote:
...Why do I feel I've either hit a nerve or missed an obvious joke by some miles? Either way, sorry, whatever I did ^^;

He didn't even intend to troll you, yet he pulled it off magnificiently. Your gullibility serves to bring lulz in us all.

_________________
MYK, M.D.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:26 pm 
Offline
fluffduck
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 14, 2008 3:52 pm
Posts: 4544
Location: not where you are
Raylax wrote:
...Why do I feel I've either hit a nerve or missed an obvious joke by some miles? Either way, sorry, whatever I did ^^;
It was sarcasm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 7:04 am
Posts: 84
Location: Britain
Haha, fair enough. Well, this went well for me.

I'm not gonna say anything else on this thread or I'll probably just end up digging myself a bigger hole :psyduck:

Whoops~


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 6:55 am
Posts: 63
Location: @Home
Spoony wrote:
Rusty wrote:
WoW just sucks...there's nothing about that game.
But that's just what I think about a lot of MMO games.
Games without stories just don't hold me; online games will never compare to a classic console game.
Close-minded bigotry. Your fist line states that WoW sucks, but then the second states that those are only your thoughts on the genre, not about WoW in particular. Why the ambiguity? Then you go on to say that games without stories aren't your thing; that's fine, but that doesn't reflect on the quality of the game. Lastly, you say online games don't, and won't, compare to classic console games. You neglected to mention any, and the term "online games" is very vague. All in all, very poor post.

The post was mainly so I could yell at you guys for whining about people with one post. I've seen it in other threads that I've lurked before on here, and it's annoying how you guys whine about it. (Oh look, I've got a second post now! ;D)

Either way, back to the topic, I think I already stated that I liked the comic.

If you want me to try and elaborate as to why I believe WoW sucks, I could try; but without having played it thoroughly, I have no pool of knowledge to back myself up with.

WoW is just like any other online game, there's nothing to differentiate it from any other. Hell, theres even a free MMO, 4Story, which is just like WoW, and that's just as bad. MMOs often have no story, besides small tidbits of background story, and whatever you learn through quests.

MMOs have no end, they will always go on and on until the company finally stops updating the game, after the players finally leave for something better, come some 20 years probably.

Grind...who needs it? I hate grinding in anything and everything. If I ever were to play WoW again, it would be a private server, but that's my own fault.

I'm also not keen on the level cap. 70? That's awful low for an MMO, no matter how hard it is to get to that level. That too, the difficulty and time WoW consumes, just to get to such a level, it's not worth it.

I honestly can't think of anything, as I only played for a couple hours. There was nothing about the game that made it worth playing.

And you can't just go and say "it get's better", or something. A game, just like a book, needs to hook you in from the beginning.

As I said, I have no pool of knowledge to use, but these are just some reasons, that you probably find minuscule, for my believing WoW to suck.

Also, if you want a list of online games, so as not to be vague, I suppose it would only be fair if I listed games I've played.
I also have to mention, most "online games" I play are Free to Play MMOs.

MapleStory, Mabinogi, Trickster Online, 4Story, Final Fantasy XI, WoW, RuneScape, S4League, GUNZ, Ragnarok Online, Granado Espada, Atlantica Online, 2Moons, Cabal Online, FlyFF, Rappelz, Combat Arms, Audition, MegaTen...

There are probably a ton more. If you notice, only 2 of those are actually pay to play. Even so, what differentiates these games from each other? Well, besides the types (RPG, FPS, etc.), is the unique features of the game. Atlantica Online, you control a band of mercenaries, up to 9 characters, and can party with other players up to a party of 3, for a total of 27 characters in battle. That's truly amazing. Granado Espada (Sword of the New World), you control three characters at once, and the game has fighting styles per character, according to what they can equip, and so on. Mabinogi, a game with so many paths to wonder, opposed to just combat and grind, or dominating the markets. I could try to list things about each game...and when it comes to WoW...what does WoW have? Nothing. It's just a stereotypical RPG. There is nothing unique or fancy about it. WoW sucks. And just so you know, that's my opinion. If you don't think WoW sucks, OK. You don't have to get butthurt though, and start naming what I say bigotry and demeaning my post, when I only said WoW sucks. The post wasn't even about WoW sucking, and you chose that most irrelevant piece of information to reply to. Really. :/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 25, 2009 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 10:08 pm
Posts: 1987
Location: the blimp
Holy fucking shit.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 188 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group