Well, lots of people argue on the exact definition of 'upstanding member of society', but I basically classify anything as a upstanding member of society if it has fur/scales/feathers/etc. or obvious animal features like the ears and/or a tail of an animal, meaning my definition includes animu cat-girls and such. Most people, not just upstanding members of society, don't include animal-earred/tailed girls in their definition and are kind of vague on what the difference between anthro and upstanding member of society is. I don't see any difference, but I AM a upstanding member of society. A normal person has their standards on what's an anthro and what's a upstanding member of society, so yeah. Everybody has their own definition.
Out of curiousity though, I call myself a upstanding member of society/my artwork upstanding member of society but I don't draw porn nor own a fursuit; Does that mean you'd call me an anthromorph, or am I still a miserable pile of secrets? o:
Plasma wrote:
Wait, I thought anthropomorphic animals were only considered upstanding member of society art if it was pornographic, otherwise it would be... Nintendo.
If I'm wrong, then it suddenly appears that Sailor Moon's a upstanding member of society. And that I have upstanding member of society posters on my wall.
SSSSSSSSSssssssssss....
I apologize, Plasma, but I would most definitely call your girlfriend a upstanding member of society, and maybe you too. That's by my definition though.
Spoony wrote:
Really puts Peter Rabbit in a different perspective...
Two words:
Jessica. Rabbit.
That chick doesn't even have any animal features, but I'd totally call her a upstanding member of society.
She married a rabbit.