AWKWARD ZOMBIE

usually not funny
It is currently Wed Dec 03, 2025 10:28 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 11:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:33 am
Posts: 8827
Location: The Inevitable City
Darkly Nightman wrote:
America's legal system sucks booty lately.


Truth

_________________
Image
Hug me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:37 pm
Posts: 3931
Location: The Present
Darkly Nightman wrote:
America's legal system sucks booty lately.


False.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 5:20 pm
Posts: 823
Torizo wrote:
He should fight the power and show up naked to court.


But would he stand up in court?

:awesome:


Last edited by Cabinet on Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:57 am 
Offline
lord shitpost
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 9:51 am
Posts: 13054
Location: C:\Mappen
Why did you link that image.

There already is an awesome smiley.

:awesome:

_________________
100% Medically Accurate
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 5:20 pm
Posts: 823
Beacuse im a stupid noob who didnt know that.

Thanks for telling me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:06 pm
Posts: 4207
Location: Galway, Ireland
Am I the only one who does think this is a serious issue? I mean, unless the garden was a specific no-trespassing zone, it DOES count as an public-accessible area and it DOES matter whether you're visibly naked from it!

Miss StarSeed wrote:
It really wouldn't surprise me if something like that has/will happen. A family was sued by a burglar when he got locked in their garage without food or water while they were on holidays and the burglar won the case.

Surprisingly enough, locking someone in a room without food or water for several days is a criminal offence. Intentionally or not. The only real way the family would've won the case is if they had shown that they had entirely checked the garage for people, children, and animals.


Edit: oh, hang on, I thought you meant that the family locked the burglar in the garage, and not that he got locked in himself. A quick google search corrected me. And also, it would've corrected you too: that case was entirely made up.

Darkly Nightman wrote:
Named after some chick named Stella who successfully sued Winnebago for over a million dollars plus a new Winnebago when she crashed her old one because she didn't know that she was still supposed to steer during cruise control

1: That "chick" is called Mr. Grazinski, not Stella.
2: That case was entirely made up.
3: The Stella Awards were named after Stella Liebeck, who sued McDonalds after she spilled a cup of coffee on herself.
4: ....and which the Stella Awards themselves acknowledge was an entirely serious, non-frivolous case.


Last edited by Plasma on Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 8:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2008 6:53 am
Posts: 13334
Location: australia
Plasma misses it


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 5:45 pm
Posts: 46
Location: Ambush, Backlot
Plasma wrote:
Am I the only one who does think this is a serious issue? I mean, unless the garden was a specific no-trespassing zone, it DOES count as an public-accessible area and it DOES matter whether you're visibly naked from it!


So running around in someone elses backyard is ok, now?

_________________
Resident night elf huntard.


Last edited by Tasty Waffle on Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:33 am
Posts: 8827
Location: The Inevitable City
Invasion of privacy is A-ok!

_________________
Image
Hug me


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:13 pm
Posts: 7469
Location: butts
Plasma wrote:
And also, it would've corrected you too: that case was entirely made up.

... 3: The Stella Awards were named after Stella Liebeck, who sued McDonalds after she spilled a cup of coffee on herself.
4: ....and which the Stella Awards themselves acknowledge was an entirely serious, non-frivolous case.
What, really? *goes to check* ... Guuuh, I'm too guillible.

I looked up the winnebago case and Liebeck vs. McDonald's just now too. OWWW, I was always told her case wasn't justified because the coffee didn't actually give her any burns. Then in truth, 20% of her body weight was lost from the burns?! I might comprehend making up ridiculous cases to support a tort reform, but lying about the truths of a case and making it sound like the poor woman wasn't seriously hurt when she obviously was just doesn't make any sense at all.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:32 pm
Posts: 3847
Location: Sopha
Darkly Nightman wrote:
All legal systems sucks booty.

Fix't

Miss StarSeed wrote:
Plasma wrote:
The Stella Awards were named after Stella Liebeck, who sued McDonalds after she spilled a cup of coffee on herself. Which the Stella Awards themselves acknowledge was an entirely serious, non-frivolous case.
Then in truth, 20% of her body weight was lost from the burns?!

Yeah. Those were some pretty bad burns.

Quote:
Liebeck was taken to the hospital, where it was determined that she had suffered third-degree burns on six percent of her skin and lesser burns over sixteen percent. She remained in the hospital for eight days while she underwent skin grafting. Two years of medical treatment followed.

Liebeck sought to settle with McDonald's for US $20,000 to cover her medical costs, which were $11,000, but the company offered only $800. When McDonald's refused to raise its offer, Liebeck filed suit.

During the case, Liebeck's attorneys discovered that McDonald's required franchises to serve coffee at 180–190 °F (82–88 °C). At that temperature, the coffee would cause a third-degree burn in two to seven seconds. Stella Liebeck's attorney argued that coffee should never be served hotter than 140 °F (60 °C), and that a number of other establishments served coffee at a substantially lower temperature than McDonald's.

Actually pictures of Stella's burns:

Rather not very nice looking images:
http://www.prwatch.org/files/images/burn.jpg
http://corpreform.typepad.com/corprefor ... -thumb.jpg

_________________
I'm not soulless. I have plenty of souls. They're just not mine.
Image


Last edited by Karilyn on Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:44 pm, edited 5 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2009 7:32 pm
Posts: 3847
Location: Sopha
Oh hey, accidental double post.

_________________
I'm not soulless. I have plenty of souls. They're just not mine.
Image


Last edited by Karilyn on Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 5:20 pm
Posts: 823
Jesus christ those burns are bad.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:24 pm 
Offline
Most Important Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:57 am
Posts: 16573
Location: alcoholism, oregon
wait did karilyn just change the images in her post to links, then quote herself when she had the images?

_________________
Quote:
[5:06:23 PM] Yeili: this is kind of cool, i've beaten a murderer in mario party.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:13 pm
Posts: 7469
Location: butts
Yeah, that... that kind of confused me too, considering the first time she warned us about how the images might be disturbing and we could view them at our own discretion, but then she DOES post them and it's... confusing.

That's the exact stuff I read when I looked it up too, although I didn't want to look up the pictures. Not my forte.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 65 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group