Raimu wrote:
It's possible I'm too "charitable" when it comes to Trump, I attribute most dangerous things he says to a combination if stupidity and the fact he's not a very articulate man. I think he's very nationalistic and wants to protect the country from outsiders, but I don't think he has the first clue how to accomplish this or the words to say it without coming off as a racist lunatic. The Pence thing I can't defend in any way, I don't think I could vote for anyone who would choose Pence as a VP... or to be associated with the man in any way.
As for the "Grab em by the pussy" thing, believe it or not, what bothers me most about that is... well how outraged people are over it? And how THAT is apparently what changed a lot of peoples minds if the correlation in polling is any indication. Maybe I'm crazy to not find it surprising or bothersome in the least, but Trump is a billionaire (allegedly) who was born with a sliver spoon in his mouth. He's rich, he's entitled, I really don't find that surprising at all? I dunno, maybe I'm weird, but I think anyone who was voting for Trump up until that statement needs to evaluate their life priorities.
But yea, there are a lot of Trump supporters who I find personally very disagreeable, who I just wouldn't get along with in real life, but some of them are pretty nice, generally rational people who I've had pleasant conversations with... despite disagreeing with them politically. Some people just.... think Hillary is a bit worse I guess?
The problem with "grab 'em by the pussy" and similar comments and how they're dismissed isn't that it's shocking or that he said "pussy." Honestly, I'm not surprised that he said it either; it's been clear for a long time that he's a spoiled, depraved shitstain. The problem is that
he's celebrating sexual battery. He's bragging about how his wealth and status let him sexually assault women without having to worry about any possible repercussions.I get that there are Trump supporters who seem nice otherwise (hell, I know a few), but so what? If you met some of the people who are in the KKK or the WBC on the street without knowing who they were, you'd probably think they were pretty nice too. A lot of the most abhorrent people can seem sweet and polite before they expose their hatred towards marginalized peoples, and can even display that hatred in ways that appear sophisticated. Trump supporters are the same way. Just because they put on the appearance of decent folks doesn't make them good people. The fact remains that they are supporting a man who has proposed and supported horrifyingly hateful and violent practices.
Le Great Handsome Oppressor wrote:
whether or not Trump supporters are racist is irrelevant - supporting someone with racist, islamophobic ideas is still supporting these ideas, even if you don't agree with them.
Raimu wrote:
Looks like I triggered you m8.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Le Great Handsome Oppressor wrote:
Godwin's Law is an outdated "gotcha!" that has no meaning when the politician Trump has Neo-Nazis supporting him openly. Things can be compared to Nazis when appropriate. A man blaming other ethnicities for the troubles his country faces is reminiscent of Hitler. I'm not sorry but no amount of funny internet memes about Godwin points changes that.
I typically can't stand it when people invoke Godwin's Law, but when a racist demagogue with awful hair rises to popularity among the uneducated masses by stirring up hatred towards marginalized groups (especially a particular religious minority) while having his supporters pledge their allegiance to him with outstretched hands, it kinda feels a little fitting.
GAAAAAH SO MANY POSTS I CAN'T KEEP UP