Reyo wrote:
You also have to realize that being trans is a bit more complicated than being black. You can hide your trans nature, while it's a bit difficult to find yourself in the position to have to "come out of the closet" as a black person. Like was discussed before there'd still be the issue of people not going along with it and just going in the restroom that doesn't apply to them anyway out of fear of negative action. Then you have the ones who might be too proud to walk into the bathroom of their choosing, making it a sort of "gay pride parade" level spectacle.
Simply put, I'm not entirely confident that instilling it will have the same level of effect as people think it will. Like even when they got rid of segregation for African americans, we still have a few pockets of people who fight it.
Personally, the idea of just having individual, unisex bathrooms, would still be the most ideal for avoiding any sort of backlash, though there is the problem of efficiency (one at a time vs 2-3 at a time.) And then having a separate bathroom for trans individuals might feel a little too much like segregation.
The suggestions to hide that you're trans* is incredibly offensive to many. It's akin to "I don't mind gay people, as long as they don't act like it;" though I know again that you didn't mean it this way. People shouldn't have to hide their identity for the sake of safety. Of course, it's a bit idealistic to pretend that resulting abuse can't be avoided by staying quiet, but we definitely shouldn't try to create situations in which it's encouraged. (I'm not trying to derail the conversation by focusing on language; rather, I'm urging caution. The literal meaning of some of the things you're saying would definitely offend a lot of people. That's why it's important to use the language very carefully in this subject.)
If people want to treat it as a pride-parade sort of moment, why shouldn't they? Sure, I'll agree that that would be kind of obnoxious to outsiders, but that isn't an important factor. What matters is that people have the liberties they should have.
It also doesn't matter if there are pockets of resistance - we wouldn't decide to get rid of murder laws because they don't stop all murders, would we? That discrimination would still pervade isn't a very strong argument against openness, because it's still a step forward.
Keep in mind, I don't support basing bathrooms on gender, for the reasons I've stated. I'm just trying to make sure both sides understand the issue properly.