Crush Bandicoot wrote:
Don't like it? Fine. Don't like it with an educated opinion, fine. Don't like it but complain to people who might discuss it? Not okay.
Sorry, but first you go and call him a retard, then you complain because he doesn't like the subject of the discussion? I don't know why people here get mad when others disagree with them, it's the epitome of close-mindedness.
Eat_box wrote:
It's like playing CS:S except it's not 6 years old.
Well maybe that's the problem, actually.
Eat_box wrote:
Also, I don't care who you are, but if you think Nazi zombies isn't fun, you are stupid. Yes I know that's insulting, but it's the truth.
I hope that's a joke, and I certainly hope that I'm not the only person who's tired of that zombie fad. That said, although I don't find the concept attractive, I haven't actually played it, so I can't really judge it.
Eat_box wrote:
I mean, sure. You can dislike the game. That doesn't make it BAD. I dislike most RPGs, but I'm not going around saying they're the worst things ever made.
You say that, but in the rest of your post you just talked about how fun and good Call of Duty is, when it's just as subjective as saying it's bad.
As far as I'm aware, many people dislike Call of Duty because of its lack of innovation, which makes it repetitive and boring (supposedly). Hell, people say it's a better version of Modern Warfare 2. I've also seen many complaints about how the weapons don't work like their real counterparts, something about some weapon having burst fire when it didn't exist during the cold war or something.
And as for myself, I haven't played it, mainly because it costs sixty bucks, is probably going to receive $15 map packs or other stupid things, and has a dumb player base.