Syobon wrote:
Because that's another thing, as far as I understand (correct me if I'm wrong), Riot has nothing to do with a player's personal stream. Again, the situation would be different if they asked the players not to promote other games while on the LCS stream.
Pretty much every pro player's stream is sponsored by the companies that sponsor their team (and I suppose you could say the team itself? Not sure how that works.). So the streams aren't
exactly personal, they're set up with the intention that they're representing their team.
Of course Riot is in it for the cheddar, they're a company, their job is to make cheddar. I'm not going to expect them to do anything otherwise. Even if their primary goal was championing the cause of esports, you do that by bringing in more cheddar through sponsorships.
My question is, is this contract necessary/beneficial? I'm not seeing the benefit, in fact if it causes such a big PR problem it might not be worth it if it did make a difference. The target audience of anything esports is the young, technologically proficient generation that has a history of balking at anything that restricts their freedom of expression, especially on the internet.
I just don't get it. There must be more to the story that we don't know about yet.
Edit: Also, suddenly the league forums are filled with self-proclaimed economy experts. greeeeeat.