AWKWARD ZOMBIE

Of the ones I've played, GTA 2 was the only one I liked.
I dunno why, since I enjoyed Bully, Saints Row 2 and Mafia: City of Lost Heaven, which are all at least inspired by Grand Theft Auto (I guess).

I was actually dissapointed with GTA IV. I liked San Andreas because it had that 'fun' element to it. A huge area to explore and crazy cheats. Thats all I need to have fun. IV didnt have that. It went for the serious route. I know some people like that but I personally didnt.

/rant

I dunno, I liked it, San Andres just felt like a big joke is all.

The RPG shit they had in San Andreas was kinda silly to me. The driving mechanics in GTA IV were horrible, and I know the cell phone thing would drive any man to distaste. Which is why I loved GTA III and Vice City. If GTA III just had a shitload of new weapons, more planes and helicopters to drive, more cars and more funy pedestrian quotes, I'd be fucking sold. All the extra stuff they added in the new ones seemed unnecessary.

Why does no one know that they can turn the phone off?

Yeah, and GTA is finicky about you having to progress to get anything good and get everywhere. Least, that's how it was for Vice City and III.

chinatown wars for ds held up pretty well, till you got bored of playing from easily obtaining dough from drug dealing.

now thing what it would of been like given they put in the taxi service in san andreas.

gta 4 has its moments in the spot light, but i swear if roman calls me one more time, next playthrough, he can stay kidnapped

IV had the same problem, but at least the main storyline was kinda interesting (I thought...)

I tended to spend most of my time mowing down innocent citizens or playing Online GTA Race and bursting tires/driving a bus though, so I don't mind the storyline not being outstanding. I can see how it would be a problem though.