AWKWARD ZOMBIE

Grats on 80.

That was for an English class. I would have been more detailed about the game if I was reviewing for a website. Geez.
I know the teacher isn't a gamer, so I might as well not spend time talking about the things she doesn't care about and instead spend time talking about the storyline. It's called considering my audience, idiot.


Also, you raeg at Polygons instead of pixels? You complain about filler, but isn't it just filler to say that polygons use pixels already?

Ah, sorry for the critisism then. Had I known you were only doing it as part of your life-lasting early education, I totally would've avoided telling you what you did horribly wrong and how to improve!


I was rage'ng at that you you said polygons and pixels were counterparts! The 2D counterpart to polygons is sprites!

Read the edit.
Also, did I ever say I'm not going to change it? For Pete's sake, don't just assume that everyone is so stubborn!

Actually, I'd call it underestimating your audience. And I don't mean this as spite, I mean it as actual helpful advice: don't assume that, because your target audience isn't familiar with the medium and how reports/reviews/etc of said medium normally work, you should simplify it down or add fluff or sacrifice normal parts of the element for more relatable things. Trust me, stuff like that WILL stand out as notably off, especially if your target audience is an English teacher, and ESPECIALLY if you're not being graded on how entertaining or relatable it is, but how well made it is!
...well, there are PROPER ways to do it, but it involves FAR more experience!

And the fact that its a game actually is less minor than you think. If she's ever read a movie review, she'll know how game reviews are meant to work too.


But... then... if you were planning on improving it, why would you reject critisism?!

Edit: oh, hang on. Are you trying to say that you ARE accepting criticism, and that you're annoyed at that I'm thinking you're not? Because, y'know, when people accept criticism, they don't make no indication that they are, quote said criticism as "blah blah blah", followed by some snarky comment like "geez", and then insult the person you're talking to (might I add, for assuming you were doing a proper review. I don't know why you thought that was insult-worthy!)

Oh for the love of...
Do I have to do this?


I am aware of my hypocrisy.

Plasma, your intention is to help but to your target you come off as nothing more than critical. I know you don't like "buttering things up" or putting padding on your words, but there is a way to be honest without tearing someone down.

I've been playing Osmos for a while since that $2 promotion on steam, and I have to say that it is extremely fun and well made, mainly the feeling you have in the levels. Still, there are some stages that are just... really really really frustrating, you have pratically to follow one only way that the game wants you to so you can pass the stage, which is the opposite of what you learn in the beggining, that you can do it however you want. That's the main strong point in the bonus levels, and what makes it great. It is very relaxing as well, if you take things slow and nice.

I don't think it is worth $10 though.

anyone who doesnt get Zeno Clash is a digital dummy

What a digital dummy.
The first thing I thought of.

Elder Scrolls 3 Morrowind.


If only spears weren't useless

HELL
YES

You have obviously never met my Spear of Huixpimmel. Maxed out Damage of every elemental type possible. (Construction Set FTW)

I hit someone with it and I never found the body.

I like hacking myself some insane amounts of gold and enchanting a weapon with max ice, fire, shock, and drain life damage...
It's amusing...

The American Bayonetta demo came out today. I'm excited.