Kamak wrote:
Dispersive wrote:
I mean, why would you get angry at this accusation unless you had a doubt in your mind about the status of it? Are you really as faithful as you believe if you are having doubts about it in the first place?
I venture to claim that your mother is a prostitute, and if you debate this point, clearly you have some doubts about whether your mother is indeed a prostitute, and if you don't debate this point, clearly you know I am right and can't debate me.
Therefore, by the fact that you cannot prove otherwise, my accusation is correct, and your mother is indeed a prostitute.
I can also prove that the Holocaust is a lie, that Superman 64 is the best game ever, and that Bush was the best president the US ever had.
Also, for a guy laughing about how people are "retarded for arguing on the internet" the fact that you made an account just to argue about the arguing is laughable too. Looks like we're all retards here.
-disregard this post-
Oh, ow. My argument is being deflated.
Ow.
It hurts.
It is sinking.
Oh nooooooooooooooooo.
No, but for seriously. It has crossed my mind multiple times that my mother might be, or might have, at some point in her life, slept with another man or woman for cheddar. Do the odds tell the same conclusion, though? No.
See, that's the great thing about statistics, you can draw a conclusion from previous encounters and escapades with a particular subject.
And before you try to turn the "statistics" argument on me, the odds that two comics with the same idea, execution, and setting come into being without one comic being a "copy", for the lack of a better term, are astronomical, and the situation is less likely than the Earth becoming a barren wasteland in the thousand years.