spongedav wrote:
BANANA wrote:
DoNotDelete wrote:
Defenestrator2.0 wrote:
KATIE ISN'T CATERING TO MY PERSONAL TASTES SO IM GOING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT IT BECAUSE IM IMPORTANT ON THE INTERNET BAWWWWWWWWWW
So you think the comic is greatf**kingsuperstardustawesomemegaepicdreamyfappadapfuel then?
I personally have noticed a recent downward trend in
the quality of Katie's work - subject matter aside.
It's not like your stuff is much better, DnD. :/
OUCH! What will DnD do now???
You guys misunderstand me - I'm not trying to be mean to Katie, I'm just trying to give her a well-meaning kick to change her approach because I'm concerned she's pushing herself too hard and her work is suffering because of it.
You guys do realise I think Katie's work is great overall right? Her stuff is what got me interested in doing comics myself.
I know my own comics don't always work perfectly but that's because
I've only drawn like maybe six or seven comics - only three of those being full length ones. I'm still getting to grips with comics, and I'd never really ever drawn comic expressions until like three months ago - so it's all new to me.
I welcome criticism of my own work because I can see everything that's wrong with my comics anyway - I always agree with people unless they have no idea what they're talking about (or talk 1337).
Sometimes you have to go ahead and finalise a comic or piece of art even though it's full of errors - it's a learning process and if you stop working midway, you're cheating yourself out of the full learning experience.
TL;DR.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
