Tall-Hatted Yanimae wrote:
Xeraphem wrote:
A) The only one to get raped was actually an attempt to save the life of said girl. It's complicated.
However complicated, a completely idiotic way to make a story go on.
He could have made his brother SAVE her from being raped or executed in a multitude of ways, but he saves her by RAPING HER?
Goddamn, how ever you put it, it's disturbing.
It's a very insensitive outlook to think "on exceptional times rape can totally save lives dur hur".
Rape DESTROYS lives. No matter the intention. Especially since this girl was, what, 14?
Whatever reason you have to like this story is fine by me, but trying to justify that whole rape issue really disturbs me.
Also, yiffyiffyiff
Well, it's not meant to justify rape in anyway, its a back setting to how corruption effects innocent lives and how those lives can carry on after growing up too fast. There was corruption within both tribes and the innocent children were exploited out of nothing more than amusement and an attempt to teach the boy a lesson in knowing his place. ((They didn't expect him to go trough with it, but they didn't find any negative repercussions that he did, a win/win for them.)) The leaders knew that it would come to this and did nothing to stop it; this is the "true" crime, ((I say true crime because that is what Mookie was conveying all along, again, no justification for rape.)) The-hero-comes-to-save-the-day case is nonexistent in this scenario, and to play any part of it to the effect would be contrived as all hell. There was no Deus Ex Machina to save her, or him for that matter, from their fate. ((She's an only child by the by, so no "brother" could have helped.))
_________________
[Citation Needed] wrote:
This just PROVES that it is best to hunt landmines with a hammer.