AWKWARD ZOMBIE

That's it, guys, pack it up and get rarin' for a rootin' tootin' vigilante criminal scumbag huntdown hoedown!

Just not today, apparently.

Day 1 - Final Vote Count

No lynch - Marcato, Need Runes4, banter, creakyAccordion, Reyo, BeatBoxingBoo, Granny Benson (7)

Reluctant to doubt any of their comrades, and wanting not to believe any of them could be killers, the world leaders quickly adjourn the first meeting of the GlobalNat conference.

Night One

Reminder: Night ends when everyone who has a night action PMs me.

e: a new rule has been added!

No meta PMs. Keep game talk confined to the game.

Hot Dog!

Refferences aside, I wasn't really here because Mafia wasn't really on my to-do list at the time.

Lets see what happens tonight.

You hear a bump in the night. You leave your dormitory to see your frightened comrades had been awakened as well. Moving slowly, silently to the source of the noise, you find a grim confirmation of your greatest fear.

Dire, Nancy Wake, Double Voter, Town-aligned has been bludgeoned to death!

In the confusion and panic, you decide the best course of action would be to conduct a head count. Everyone is present -- except one.

TurboPunz, Cicero, Vanilla, Town-aligned has been stabbed to death!

The life of the dead is placed in the memory of the living.
~Marcus Tullius Cicero

Day 2 Votes

With 10 living, it takes 6 votes to lynch.

So now we have a serial killer. Fan. Tastic.

I still vote no lynch

Ehh, on the one hand we don't have enough real suspicions to figure out who the hell we want to lynch - we'd be random-guessing at best, it seems. On the other hand, we seem to have a third-party killing role on our hands, which means that if we don't lynch anyone today we're just giving scum two free kills. The question is also whether we have a serial killer or a vigilante on our hands - both are functionally the same thing, except a vigilante would at least be trying to help us. Fingers crossed, here.

So it's like, daisies, I really don't want to no-lynch again because with 10 people left, 2 more gone would be a serious blow, but on the other hand... who're we supposed to suspect? Anyone else have any ideas?

I don't think a vigilante would be rash enough to try and kill someone on the very first night, but I've been wrong before. I don't have any ideas for who to lynch right now, so I'll wait until a few more people post.

Well, we need to lynch someone. I vote lynch BeatBoxingBoo. He/she was pretty quick to get a vote in.

I'm still not totally sure, yet. Maybe just a bit more time before I make my decision.

Wow, a vig/serial killer character...

Hopefully, if it's a vig, they'll restrict kills more to just suspicions and not just random people hoping for a good kill. If they're a serial killer...well...I don't know...

...Either way, usually I'm an advocate mor for hesitating with the suspicions, but I can't help but feel that we're pressed for action given the whole "2 kills per night" bit...

Hmm. On the one hand going for a lynch on such a small suspicion feels wrong, but on the other hand it's not like we have anything better to go off of. Personally, though, I think we should give BeatBoxingBoo a chance to defend themself. It is kinda iffy the way they jumped right to "no lynch" without even trying to provide a rationale, though. I could understand if they gave some kind of reasoning but just... nope. So I'm kinda leaning towards that, too, but I'd like to wait and see, first, if anyone has any other ideas.

If i were to suspect him, it would just be on how quickly it came out, and not on the fact that it was a "no lynch" mainly because that's the path I would go myself were it not for the whole "2 people killed per night" thing.

Yeah, as I said, it's moreso how quickly they decided on it and how with such an apparent quick decision they didn't bother with any rationale. I feel like with two people dying every night, not bothering to lynch anyone just isn't something we can afford to do, especially not without thinking about it for a while first.