BurntToShreds wrote:
The "2016 is the worst" trend/meme/whatever has been pissing me off somewhat fierce lately. A lot of celebrities dying because they did too many drugs back when they were younger (or were just plain old at the time they died) and divisive, often hostile political rhetoric ending in elections/referenda in which demagoguery won doesn't make a year instantly the worst ever. You know how bad 1916 was? It was smack-dab in the middle of World War 1. There was the Battle of the Somme, a horrible confrontation that lasted 4 months and took a million lives with it. And things didn't magically get better once it became 1917. The ubiquitous and instantaneous nature of sharing stories on social media made 2016 seem worse than it actually was.
You do realize that every generation is monumentally self-absorbed, yes? No human who has ever been born is ever capable of understanding that the world continues after him, and existed before him. Even at its most self-sacrificing, humanity only understands that it's making a sacrifice for its own renown, otherwise it wouldnt do it at all. The soldiers who marched off in WW1 just assumed that they'd win because they were them. Obviously Providence had chosen them alone to win.
2016 will live in infamy because the current crop of pop culture defines itself by its celebrities rather than nationalism. Nevermind that most of them were into their 60s and 80s, they were the icons of the baby boomers so the whole world has to stop.