Plasma wrote:
Missed a lot of posts in a short while.
First, Karylin, when talking about Protestant Churches only, don't say Christian Churches.
You can blame it on humans being naturally geocentric.
It's also due to my church upbringing.  In the protestant church, "We are Christians, and they are Catholics."  The protestant church refuses to acknowledge other branches as being christians, and insists that they are pagans and heathens.
Quote:
Secondly, at least in Ireland, the idea that someone would know about sex before they know about contraceptives, just from friends and media, is absolutely absurd! It could be different in North America though, considering how sparsely populated it is in the non-major cities. But here, if someone didn't use (or try to use) a contraceptive, then its always because they forgot, they tried something else (such as pulling out), or they just didn't care. Even in places where contraceptives are less talked about, to say that those three reasons still aren't often the reason is ridiculous! 
It is different in America, because contraceptives are largely censored heavier than sex in America.  There are a lot of adults who have no fucking clue what a condom even is.
I can point to dozens of fully grown adults who over the years, have told me that you can get pregnant from oral sex and anal sex (and they aren't talking about sperm getting leaked over into the uterus).
There is no such thing as sex-ed in America.  We have "Abstinence-Only" sex-ed.  Which basically means, they tell people nothing, and don't explain to people how their bodies work.  Hell, even I barely know how my body works.  Everything I have learned was from the Internet and wikipedia, so I'm sure there is massive gaps in my knowledge of how my body works.
Also, minor change of topic... the sparsely populated thing is a misconception that other countries have of America, in part due to television seems to talk about only New York and Hollywood.  Yeah we have a lot of empty areas, but people in America typically gravitate to areas with a population density of something around 700 people per square mile (around 250 per square km).
Yeah it's definitely not New York city, but it's hardly sparsely populated.  It's called Suburbia.
Saying America is sparsely populated, is like saying Dublin is the only city in Ireland... Wait, Dublin isn't the only city in Ireland is it?
plasma wrote:
Karilyn wrote:
2.4 * 10 ^ (1 * 10 ^ 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 )
Hang on... a 100% chance is defined as 1. How the hell are you meant to have a 2.4*10^1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000% chance of it happening? That's on top of the 1*10 part of the calculation! You really managed to screw up your syntax there!
Plus, like I said, it'd be impossible to calculate.
 
Yeah I forgot my syntax.  There, I added a probability to it.  And the reason there is the second scientific notation inside of it, is because you kinda have to cause... 10 ^ (1 with a trillion zeros) is a really fucking big number.
1 : 2.4 * 10 ^ (1 * 10 ^ 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 )
Either way, like I said, the chance was essentially "lol"
But considering the universe and time is infinite, it doesn't matter how laughable the probability was, because there is no limit to the possibility.
I suppose it was fairly psuedo science-y, but what it was was the guy used the ratio of all the elements in the universe, then calculated the probability of the correct combination of elements coming together in a space less than a square millimeter (so they could mix and form an amino acid), over the 14 billion years the universe has been around, for the square millimeters in the universe (Another ludicrously large number).
It's good enough for me to say that the probability was laughably small.  Fuck yeah, we won the lottery.