People who say the entire genre of fighting games take no skill. Maybe that's because you don't give them any. Do you wave your hand in front of a vending machine and then say that it doesn't take any cheddar? So many of these people say that "You can just mash buttons and win". Sure, you
can mash buttons and win, just like how a monkey
can hit the keys on a typewriter and write out the entire collection of Shakespeare's works, though it's not going to do that first against a monkey who understands how to use a typewriter, remembers or can just read the collection, and isn't possibly metaphorically, possibly bodaciously shitting over something that it doesn't understand. And even if you change that to just "All you do is mash random buttons" it's still wrong. YOU mash random buttons.
YOU want to go to Santa Fe. Another thing I keep seeing these kinds of people do is look at two people playing terribly and take that as evidence that the game takes no skill. So basically if that second monkey was in fact possibly bodaciously, possibly metaphorically shitting over something that it doesn't understand, then they would watch those two monkeys shit over a typewriter and take that as evidence that writing takes no skill. You know how ridiculous that is? That's as ridiculous as watching two monkeys shit over a typewriter and taking that as evidence that writing takes no skill. They're watching a low amount of skill being applied and assuming that any higher amount doesn't or can't exist. Do they look at the biology class of a school and say that it only teaches one subject? Do they take 3 steps up Mount Everest and say that it's short? Do they still play peek-a-boo? Because they're still going to be wrong even when they look away from that fact, though they seem to be doing that quite often already.
Boy for something that "mildly annoyed" me I sure did possibly metaphorically, possibly bodaciously shit a whole lot over this extremely unimportant subject.