Yesterday, thanks to the U.S. Justice Department under Obama, the FBI gained more powers to more easily hack into people's computers. AT&T has ran and continues to run a huge mass surveillance regime for law enforcement. This will likely never be brought up during the hearing regarding AT&T's merger with Time Warner, which would make them one of the biggest, if not the biggest, media conglomerate ever.
What these two things have in common is how shockingly little media exposure they got. The changes to the FBI's Rule 41 got articles in the likes of USA Today, Gizmodo, and Engadget and Reuters in the day of December 1st and the day after, but I can't find much in the way of articles on these mainline news and tech news sites in the weeks and days leading up to December 1st. The AT&T Hemisphere program was uncovered in 2013, but the company has faced shockingly little backlash since then.
The amount of complacency and neglect that people show these issues both irritates and disturbs me. I think that a lot of average people thought that after SOPA was defeated, everything would be good from then on out and no steady amount of pressure or scrutiny would need to be maintained. People got over the Snowden Revelations stunningly fast. The only real wins that the public's gotten since then have been the net neutrality ruling in 2015 (and the subsequent court cases that have affirmed the FCC's power to uphold net neutrality rules) and the widespread coverage of the FBI trying to force Apple to break their own security (and to set a precedent that they could get other tech companies to do the same). Apparently people only care when you mess with their ability to easily stream Netflix or if you mess with their beloved multi-billion-dollar tech brands. Of course all of that will likely go out the window with our upcoming President. The only thing that he can't undo is the untethering of ICANN from the U.S. Commerce Department. Glad that got done before the election.
You'd think that with Trump being the President-elect, there would've been more widespread coverage of things that could have the potential to give him even more easily abuse-able power. The Justice Department just gave him a massive new power, and Obama, being the head of the Executive branch, could have easily stopped the go-ahead with the changes to Rule 41. But he didn't. And nobody seems to have really called him out on that or his other non-actions on issues pertaining to mass surveillance.
Complacency and apathy in all of their forms are the worst things for us to keep on with during these upcoming four years, especially in regard to policies that deal with the openness of the Internet and the ability for governments to mass-spy on their citizens.