Oh, of course Hillary is just as bad. Haven't you seen the face book posts basically saying "if it comes down to Trump. v. Clinton, I'm skipping the country" or "Trump v. Clinton? I think you mean Top socket v. bottom socket" with a picture of a little kid sticking a knife into an electrical outlet. The majority of Republican and Democrat candidates are nearly indistinguishable these days, save for the issues of abortion, marriage, and how to alter welfare assistance. A lot of people just like to complain more loudly about Trump for the same reason they like reality TV and gossip magazines. It's easy outrage, which can be a nice vent for general frustration of life. This isn't to say anything about the specific ethnic or religious identities that he has directly offended. They sort of have reason to hold a social grudge against him.
I actually think that Sanders isn't completely crazy (although that's a much more complex economics argument about the specific points I like and what I dislike/am uncertain about), but it would probably take more than eight years to smoothly transition into the changes he wants. And with the sheer amount of Congressional resistance he'd meet (kind of like the other two, really), I doubt he'd get enough things that he wants done in the time he wants to do it, even in the unlikely event that he were to be elected for two terms. So any changes he were to attempt would basically be undone the moment he leaves office, because they would be incomplete systems.
Quote:
Also, that bit about only so many immigrants being allowed citizenship is kind of messed up. But is there a reason for it to be that difficult?
~*BUREAUCRACY*~
(I can't find what I would consider certainly reliable information at the moment, but I would infer that it is largely due to bureaucratic inefficiency, rather than a deliberate "fuck you". At least, not entirely. The application process is made deliberately difficult for adults who are not yet fluent in English.)