AWKWARD ZOMBIE

Millers only show up as mafia from lynch deaths right? And investigations, but those don't matter now.

With 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

SaintCrazy: Tammerath
D-vid: Undecided
Kamak: Tammerath
Reyo: Tammerath
Guyperson: Tammerath

He hasn't said anything yet.
I feel icky voting for him if he hasn't said anything yet.

I don't remember, Kamak. What accusation did you make?

Also, Guy: why so quick to jump on the bandwagon? You gave absolutely no explanation of your opinion. As far as I can remember that's what you've done for almost all of this game. And to me, that reeks of mafia.

So I'm going to say Lynch Guyperson.

And if you mean the accusation you made when you said that the data indicated me as mafia, then what am I going to say other than that you're making the wrong decision? And what can I say that will make you believe me?

What if this is another one of Kamak's "tests"? This is a crucial voting day, and we can't be psyched out. I know they weren't the ones who voted first, but it seems like we're all basically using his charts more than our own suspicions. Looking at the chart, the only who'll seem innocent is Kamak. Kind of convenient. Honestly, I haven't considered Tammerath because he was semi-quiet and neutral (other than when he's voting). The mafia always aims at quiet people, so isn't it a bad idea to try and lynch another one?

Though, SaintCrazy, I understand you wanting to lynch him. You've been wanting to lynch him for a while now. But for everyone else I want to know their own reasons. (Especially Guy's. Calm down caps lock.)

Basically, my own suspicions have the most suspicious people (based on voting trends) as me, you, guy, tam, and Kamak. I know I'm innocent, and Kamak, while not immune to my suspicion, seems the most trustworthy.

Lynching for tam is consistent with both kamak's, and my own data. That's why I have it up there.

This is why I was kinda hoping someone with a gun would step up and help off someone the town suspects. If we lynch a mafia, we can't be sure if we actually hit a miller. At least if we shot them, we'd know for sure if they were mafia or miller.

I'm pretty sure Tam is mafia (at the very least, he's our straightest shot at it), but it wouldn't hurt to have definitive information on him or later lynch possibilities.



Even so, you played dumb and completely ignored the conclusions I drew from the data. If you were town and I implicated you, I would have figured you would start throwing quotes at me or point incessantly at me framing you. The fact that you didn't say anything told me that you didn't have a plausible defense, and as long as no one pointed the finger at you, everything was fine. Just like Cori.



I will come out and say that this isn't a test.

I've yet to see anyone (besides me) say definitively that they're using my chart to determine their vote, though frankly, nothing on the chart itself is objectively wrong. It's up to them to determine what's right based on what they know. The chart is merely a tool to help.

And here's the thing, if I was mafia, and we were 1 kill away from winning yesterday, why would I implicate Cori? My best bet would be to lead the town against a fellow town, and if that didn't work out, I'd take one for the team.

And keep in mind, I've suspected you, Cori, and Tam for awhile. You defending Tam definitely lines up with the conclusions I've made.

Saint, the issue with millers is that, so far, we have complete confidence that everyone who's died is NOT a miller, which leaves them still in play. At this point, if we lynch someone and they pop up mafia, there's no telling if they really are a mafia member or just a townie who was unlucky enough to get suspected of being mafia. The gunsmith knows he's safe (and so do the mafia), but the plain booty vanilla village members could come out as anything.

Kamak, I got a gun. Who do you want to get shot.

I would suggest either Reyo or Angie. If we shoot Reyo, we lose a Tam vote, but you could fill the void, and only 4 votes would be needed then. If we shoot Angie, it doesn't affect votes, but it'll help shed light for later.

You could shoot Tam, but we've pretty much got him pinned down in the town vote.

Ultimately, I'll leave the decision up to you.

And until you make a decision, I'm changing my vote to undecided so the day doesn't end early. I'll be changing it back to Tam (unless something kills him).

I'm not sure we're ahead enough to risk shooting a townie, though.

The way I see it, the person has the same chance of being a miller regardless of how they get killed.
And if someone does turn out to be a miller, what then? How would we use that info to guide our lynch?

IFF we're going to shoot someone, we need to have a plan for the outcome.

Indeed, I didn't give a reason when I lynched. I also didn't mention I'm a townie, but that doesn't mean I'm not a townie anymore.

With day lynches, if I think people will actually lynch me, I can try convince them not to, but still try to be worthless enough in the eyes of the mafia to avoid being killed. If I look smart, nothing can save me from the night kill. And survival is important when the smart people need my vote. So let the smart people who I think are innocent choose from the other people for me. I know I haven't been at real risk of being lynched yet, so they're doing something right IMO.

A gun can always save you from the mafia.

This message was sponsored by the NRA.

So should we just lynch Tam and possibly shoot tomorrow? Or shoot Tam and use the votes against him as further evidence as to whether the voters were guilty or not?

The main thing that worries me is that, in the event that Tam is miller and we lynch him, Mafia can get us down to 3v3 tomorrow without us knowing, and then it'll come down to needing to use guns to fix the odds.

Either way, if we use the gun today, I suggest that the Gunsmith give that person a new one for protection.