Text dump ahoy (also edit at the end)
Curly Tale wrote:
Anyway, the link is just to a video that shares some of my feelings, thoughts and worries. If I offend anyone, let me know so I can apologize.
Okay, I just watched the video.
It's very biased, does not support its arguments properly and is also filled with incorrect data / lies.
Some thoughts, in chronological order:
Do governments actually
promote marriages of any sort? The legal system provides a structure for marriage and defines it, yeah, but it doesn't do anything else.
Quote:
Perpetuation and stabilization of society
This is a big one. Here's the scoop: gay people have always existed. They are not a new trend that threatens the soul of misguided young people like rock'n'roll and D&D. Perpetuation of human society is doing just fine. In fact, we are going to face a major overpopulation problem in a few decades because more and more people have access to health care and don't die at 32. Gay people are not a different race of people that can't reproduce and will eventually replace the fertile population. The straight population has always been there and will always be there and there will never be too many gay people because that's not how that works.
Quote:
This understanding of marriage is rooted in the biological facts of nature
Homosexuality is also part of nature. This is intentionally misleading.
Quote:
"Goverment promotes ~~~Natural~~~ marriage
Again, biased from the start and devoid of all factual meaning.
Quote:
~~~Natural~~~ marriage benefits society because:
I'm gonna be nice and assume these points are married vs unmarried and not ~~~natural~~~ vs homosexual because oh boy.
Quote:
creates children
Married people often don't have any kids. Unmarried people often have kids. This means nothing.
Quote:
Best raises children
No source, unclear who they are being compared too. This argument has no value.
Quote:
Protects women
Bullshit.
Quote:
Civilizes men
Again, no actual statistics, no source, and a rhetoric question at the end to hide that.
Quote:
~~~Natural~~~ marriage perpetuates and stabilizes society
Why do they insist on calling it "natural" every single time if not to imply not all marriages are right? This is twisted and disgusting.
Quote:
Benefits of same sex marriage: crickets
Oh just fuck off. None of the statistics they pulled out of their booty previously couldn't apply here because it has nothing to do with the parents' sex life. Same-sex marriage protects parents from having to abandon their careers to raise their kids the exact same way their so-called ~~~natural~~~ marriage does. Same thing with raising kids better because they are in a more financially secure family supposedly. Homosexual people can produce children just fine and often do, just not the same way, and again this has nothing to do with whether or not they are married. This is misleading and deceitful.
Quote:
Promoting same-sex marriage[...]
Again, nobody is promoting anything.
Quote:
[...]changes the purpose of the civil institution of marriage
Perhaps you just never understood marriage in the first place then. Marriage has not been about making babies for a good while now. Do those conservatives never raise their eyes above their Bibles and see that most marriages end in divorce and how often they are just a reason for a big sparkly expensive party with a big sparkly expensive rock on a ring? Do they not know about drive-thru weddings and how many young people in most civilized countries don't get married because they know they don't have to to make baby and live together?
Quote:
Same-sex marriage merely validates sex partners
People having sex for reasons other than reproduction? Well I never! Also this is implying that straight people don't have sex outside of marriage and that couples exist for no other reason than reproduction. Let's force all infertile and post-menopause women to stay single then! This makes no sense.
Quote:
We know *cough* statistically *cough* that ~~~natural~~~ marriage creates the best possible family for children
and then no explanation at all. What statistics? How do you quantify children-friendliness? How can you have sufficient data on a phenomenon that hasn't been even remotely widespread until a few years ago?
Quote:
If we alter the purpose of marriage the losers will be the children
Think of the children!! Seriously, what do the children care? Lies, lies, lies.
Quote:
Doesn't every child deserve a mom and dad?
Will somebody think of the children!!!! This argument has no value and makes no sense. Doesn't every child deserve a puppy?
Quote:
But what about ~~~natural~~~ marriages that don't produce children?
Oh, you caught up with the audience.
Quote:
They are the exception, not the rule. The only relationships that do create children are between a man and a woman. NO EXCEPTIONS
This is purposely disregarding what I said about marriage and reproduction being unrelated and homosexual people being able to reproduce too.
Quote:
Wherever same sex marriage is promoted, schools subject your kids to mandatory homosexual curricula
But seriously what about the children!!!!!! Source? Why is that bad? Are they implying they are going to brainwash kids into becoming gay? That's not a thing.
Quote:
Your business and taxes fund homosexual relationships
Source? Facts? Are homosexuals undeserving of help? Does Barack Obama personally hand gold-plated dildos to gay people now? Is that worse than spending a thousand billion dollars to steal oil from brown people and call it liberation?
Quote:
Your MY GOD-GIVEN RIGHT TO SAY WHATEVER THE FUCK I WANT AND DISREGARD ALL CONSEQUENCES TO WHAT I SAY is gagged
Not my freedums! Nobody has ever been fired for saying dumb shit before! Letting gay people marry totally changes that!
Quote:
The government has no compelling interest in legally promoting same sex marriage. NONE!!
Good thing nobody is talking about promoting it then.
Quote:
~~We~~ have very reason to continue to promote ~~~all natural lo-fat marriage~~~
Really? I have not seen a single valid argument for that in the last 3 minutes.
Quote:
The law already treats everyone equally! Every citizen can marry someone of the opposite sex
That's now how that works. You can't claim to treat everyone equally because you only have urinals in your bathrooms. Straight people are not treated equally because they can marry the person they love and gay people cannot. This is stupid.
Quote:
The Law treats all PEOPLE the same, but it doesn't treat all behaviors the same
and gay people aren't people!
Quote:
Same sex marriage and ~~~natural marriage~~~ are different behaviors with different outcomes so the law ~rightfully~ treats them differently
Maybe back in 1850 and in the South, but not anymore. People get married as a symbol of their love, for shits and giggles or to circumvent immigration law, not to get permission to reproduce.
Quote:
Isn't this discrimination against homosexuals NO!!1 This discriminates against behaviors, not people
Liking people of your own sex is a behavior right? It's not part of your identity right? You can fix that with perseverance and prayers right?
Quote:
People who don't get married aren't discriminated when we promote ~~~natural olive oil marriage~~~
And same-sex marriage differs from that how?
Quote:
Same sex marriage advocates need to be more tolerant
HAHAHA
Quote:
Only the union of one man and one woman should be promoted because it alone is the foundation of a civilized society
There is nothing else required, no siree. We taught bacteria about marriage and they developed poetry and law enforcement overnight. Also ancient Greece never existed.
Quote:
That's not bigotry, that's biology
Yeah if you failed it I guess.
Overall, that video is propaganda by conservatives for conservatives using grade school science with the goal of making themselves self-righteous about their bigotry. I strongly suggest you stop listening to that kind of trash and find proper sources instead.
Curly Tale wrote:
I see that a lot of the people here didn't like the video. I was rather hesitant to posting it in the first place, I probably shouldn't have. Sorry if I offended you, I try to do more research into the issue and come back with better facts next time. Thanks for being understanding.
Basically, I done did mess up. Sorry.

To clarify, I don't think any less of you now than before. You are not ill-intentioned, just misinformed.