[Citation Needed] wrote:
Alkarii wrote:
But the original reason for the second amendment was for national defense. Suppose the US got invaded. I don't know about right now, but around ten years ago, most of our military wasn't even in this hemisphere. There are some who argue that part of the reason no one would try to invade (although Japan had attacked the mainland in WW2) is because of how many guns civilians have access to here. You think we had it bad with insurgents in the middle east? There's a hell of a lot more Americans with guns than there are insurgents/terrorists/whatevs in the middle east. While it's probable that more civilians in this country are all talk than there are who would actually fight back, it'd be pretty daisies bad for any invading force. That's actually the reason for the second amendment.
You're almost right, but
just barely.
You suggested that the US was a weak military target in 2005. The second amendment was not made with 2005 in mind.
It was made 25 years after the US became it's own thing. my understanding is that it was to make it so that an invasion would be much more difficult if Britain ever decided the US ever looked like an easy target again, because every citizen would be armed and function as a soldier to some degree.
The reason nobody is invading the mainland USA is because it would be suicide BECAUSE of our absurd armed forces, NOT because of untrained civilians with pistols and maybe 10 people per state (barring Texas, of course. Get your shit together, Texas) with automatic rifles. The second amendment was made with the concerns of 1791 America in mind, not 2015 America.
The Second Amendment originated from an era when moving armies was a slow and costly affair, especially in a nation that wasnt very centralized as the original U.S was. Armed local militias were intended to hold off any possible foreign invaders until the federal goverment could form a response, and it also removed some of the costs of keeping a standing army. That amendment hasnt had any application since the turn of the 20th century when the U.S had become one of the most powerful nations on Earth. Now, its just an excuse for Clint Eastwood wannabees to feel like big men. A gun wont give you the protection you think it would during a home invasion, you're better off with a board with a nail in it. They wont help you against foreign military either, as professional modern soldiers will be so much better trained and armed than civilians that you might as well be trying to fight them off with slingshots.
That whole slippery slope argument is complete bullshit, Sweden has much stricter MY GOD-GIVEN RIGHT TO SAY WHATEVER THE FUCK I WANT AND DISREGARD ALL CONSEQUENCES TO WHAT I SAY laws than the U.S, you'll go to jail over half the shit you guys let people get away with, and we havent turned into some Orwellian dystopia.