AWKWARD ZOMBIE

That is possible but it's the same likelihood of you being mafia as well, we can only trust you on your word.

I've editted all of my posts in the interests of preserving the validity of the game. If that's the main concern, then the best thing to do is to stop paying attention to it and keep playing the game. The DM can make his own judgment as he sees fit. I've done my part.

You can at the very least trust that I had a gun and used it. I also claimed Otacon, so I have a means to have gotten that gun. There were no deaths the past two nights, and I've claimed to have had vests. Everything I've said has checked out.

You on the other hand, there's no physical evidence of anything. You claim Granny investigated you and found you innocent, but Granny is dead and can't confirm anything. It'd be easy for mafia to say they were investigated and "obviously" found innocent when the person who could object is dead. Even easier if they're scum that could be investigated as innocent.

Either way, for now, I won't pursue you for a lynch. I don't have enough to believe it's a good lead, and I don't want to hit wrong.



I'm pretty daisies sure this isn't allowed, especially in a death post, but now I'm what the fucking over what actually happened.

Either way, I hit scum. And I intend to continue that.

And I'm leaving the links in this post considering at least two people in the game have seen them and we can't guarantee that more didn't, including mafia.

This was really stupid, and editing them out doesn't fix the problem, Reyo.

n/a

Eh, he's right, the damage is done. There were there for a decent while, enough for people to have seen it.

But yes.

This is why we can't have nice things.

This is completely unrelated to anything, but in that last evidence you posted, the word "again" was highlighted as a link. I wanna see what it was.

n/a

Because what keeps some people from seeing the information and using it as leverage against the people who don't, or the people who saw it would believe you, but the people who didn't wouldn't have proof.

The rules are there for a reason. You can quote what you get in a PM, because anyone can write up text, but screencapping has always been against the rules.

You're providing information that is not known certainly in the game (after all, it's what people were debating on).

And that may not be the only issue at hand here, but that's up to Supaaku to decide.

n/a

@Kamak: I'm pretty sure my actions throughout day two and three show how pro-town I am, even if they were mistakes. If Granny would have role claimed, like I'd hope he would if he was the cop, we wouldn't be discussing if I was guilty or not. I'm only a vanilla town so I can't really give you concrete evidence, you just gotta trust that I have towns best interest in mind

Ironically, on average, the persons who say "I'm only vanilla townie" were more likely to be mafia than anything else.

Anyway.
I believed that Reyo got saved by Naomie 3 times in a row. That's something doctor would do. What I don't believe is mafia trying to kill him 3 times in a row. And since Kamak being Otacon makes sense and no one counterclaimed getting anything, I'd say yeah, Mafia got Grey Fox wrapped up in a cycle of sex. But why don't they just kill him?

Well shit... I want to keep this game going. From what I'm being told, Naomi Hunter had been compromised. As a result I'm going to switch their role with one other person from the Support Group.
That person will be notified shortly.

What, she's been compromised?

Apparently Reyo knew who she was.

That's all I know on the matter.

Apparently. I received a PM that showed Naomi was revealed. I expect the new Naomi to keep their role on a strictly need to know basis as well as the old Naomi to not raise a fuss about it in the thread. I have no idea who saw the post in question before it was edited out but this was a precautionary measure to prevent the game becoming unfair.