Kamak wrote:
Shadow voted against D-vid on the first day when Darkin was accused out of the blue and then switched to Nobody when D-vid called him out. He didn't vote for Darkin until Darkin outed himself. On day 2, he voted for Oracle and then switched to getting rid of Noff, something, it seems, only Shadow did.
Okay, so I voted D-Vid since I didn't like the two choices: Noffletoff or Darkin. Noffle randomly chose a person and decided to lynch Darkin, with no reasoning to why he did so, despite being asked by 4 different people. I changed my vote, after picking D-vid, to no one to prove a point, there was no reasoning to any of their sides. Now, when Darkin admitted to being the fair lass, was I meant to keep my vote on no one? I'm sure there was no reasoning to why a town would do that, and there are no 3rd party roles, so I thought it was a justified band wagon.
Day 2, the votes were on IO, and that was because IO wanted to lynch Noffletoff. Noffletoff lead people against IO until IO had to admit to being the drunk. Of course I was going to change my vote since we had two confirmations. Noffletoff then proceeded to lynch and suspect random people, with very little reasoning. I decided to change my vote to Noffletoff, because it is strange for a town, with both confirmed investigate rolls dead, to be choosing and lynching people at random. He seemed suspicious, and more likely to be guilty, than IO. So I changed from IO to Noffletoff.