Marcato wrote:
Crap, I screwed up. Looks like I HAVE to role reveal before everyone starts coming at me with the pitchforks.
Hello, it's me, the Femme Fatale. I visited Kamak on Night One, Giraffe on Night Two, and Turbo on Night Three.
Also I have a great butt.
Mwaa~
I can back Marcato's claim. I previously said that I was visited by the Femme Fatale but didn't say which night I was visited (I think), so their alibi checks out.
Reyo wrote:
Kamak wrote:
Reyo, I lead the prison by example. Leading them along like ducks to the slaughter is going to make them question what your motive is and end up with your neck on the line.
I'd rather sit back, clear my name, and offer encouragement when the others make reasonable claims and call people into question when they jump the gun. Maybe I'm not hands on, but it keeps me safe and the prison from jumping my booty on a bad call.
Then why is it you've been vehemently advocating for my lynch while I have yet to suggest anyone vote to lynch anyone in particular? You've been playing by the exact same tactic you're accusing me of employing, and saying that it's the exact reason why I should be lynched. I shouldn't have my trust in question because I haven't said anything requiring a level of trust yet. I've barely openly suspected anyone, yet this is around the third time you've tried to slip my name in for a lynch, especially since this is about the 5th time my name has been dropped at all. You're saying I'm the one leading the town like ducks to slaughter? Kamak...I AM the duck being lead to slaughter...by you.
If you were being led to the slaughter by me I'd be gunning harder. I just want your name in the back of people's minds since you present the most obvious threat at this point, having suggested Turbo be given a shiv for almost no real tactical reason (when the manufacturer wouldn't even know if Turbo was a warden unless Turbo was the manufacturer), and then goading Turbo into a compromising state. This is manipulative, not necessarily suggestive, and there seems to be no real logic behind it because there's always a contradiction in there.
-If you and Turbo were both on the same side, there would be no reason to ask if they got a shiv on the thread.
-If you and Turbo are not on the same side (mafia or warden where you'd know), then you'd be potentially suggesting a shiv to them in the blind, or in the hopes that they could be turned by the interrogator and give you a free kill. But then it wouldn't make sense to grill them afterwards, unless the interrogator failed to turn them. But if that was the case, Turbo wouldn't have reason to hide that they were visited by the interrogator, as they previously stated that they were only visted by the femme fatale, which Marcato backs up.
Your actions don't make sense, and it seems strange that you jumped on turbo for not giving you information that you nor other players in the game earned the trust to know.
All the same, I'm staying back on a lynch for you because I'd rather watch you for now and not be the only one watching you, so no, I'm not vehemently after you for a lynch. It's up to the others if they feel like you're a good target, but for now, I'd like to bank on the idea that with you alive, if you are pulling anything, you won't be able to get away with it unseen. If not, well then the extra attention might give you some allies that will back you.
For now, I'd rather be leery than let someone walk into a potential lynch trap.