AWKWARD ZOMBIE

I'll vote to off Noff.

If Noff is telling the truth, then we lose a matey. If IO is telling the truth, we lose our drinking buddy.

Given this, Noff is the safer choice of the two.

And if Noffle is innocent, that should be more than enough to confirm that IO is the drunken sailor.

Lynch Noffletoff.

Constantly and often apparently means "once" in your vocabulary and that was from Darkin to no lynch because everyone was annoying me with not wanting to lynch then back to Darkin.

And I said Oracle is innocent because it would be fucking stupid to lie about that role because the claimed receivers would know.
Except if you're telling me that she basically told us 2 other mutineers.

I'm switching back to

Undecided.

I'm confused and as such can't allow myself to lynch anyone.

Oracle has proven his innocence in his actions as booze giver, and yet supaaku switches his vote to Oracle anyway? Either a mistake, or evidence of guilt. I'm gonna say KEELHAUL SUPAAKU, and hope a bandwagon forms.

I'm also going to give a little more explanation to my Noff is innocent reasoning. When Noff was being asked to confirm whether he received booze (after the message receiving drama), while Oracle was still trying to prove himself innocent as boozer, he did in fact claim he received the booze. Had he said he didn't, Oracle's testimony might have lost some credibility and Oracle would wind up being on the chopping block. Now, the fact Noff saved him means either A) he and Oracle are both mutants, B) they are both innocent and honest. But here's why A isn't possible: if neither of them were actual boozers/recipients, they would never have known that until recently, non-actors didn't get their booze message, and they would have feigned getting booze when they couldn't have known.

In short, booze is the turning point in my argument because people used to be unable to tell when they're drunk. If both Oracle and Noff were guilty they would have faked receiving the booze before being told Sol didn't send out messages. If Oracle was guilty and Noff innocent or vice versa, Noff would have no reason to claim he received booze. If they are both innocent, things will have proceeded as they have. Need_runes is innocent on the same grounds.

If Noffle didn't say he received the booze and Oracle went to the chopping block, and Oracle is confirmed to be the drunk, then Noffle would very likely be guilty. Oracle wouldn't have lied since it wouldn't benefit anyone. Noffle would have no reason to lie except if he is mafia, but then he would practically be committing suicide for a single day lynch.

True dat I guess. Was Noffle guilty he would have said he didn't get any booze, probably killing Oracle (even though as I said, lying about being that role is stupid for that very reason).

Uhhhh... I dunno, I say undecided for now, but I'm kinda suspicious about that Brekk guy because he's exaggerating what I did yesterday and stuff.

Actually, that was why I wouldn't think he would lie, regardless of alignment. It's illogical. Town = No reason to lie about the drunk message, while mafia = no reason except for getting a day lynch, but you are practically sacrificing yourself to be lynched the next day.

Well it would make sense for a vanilla mafia. Like sacrificing a pawn to kill a strong piece in chess.

But how much of a threat is the drunk to the mafia? The mafia have lost the fair lass, and the only other power role has a 50% to reveal themselves, and will result in an obvious day lynch.

Oh, right. Without a useful power role that is no problem.

I am undecided on wwho to send to the gallowws.


I am actually so fuckin confused right now

If somebody had 'Undecided' as a username, they would have loads of problems in mafia.

I think I'm going to go with my suspicion of Brekk cause else this day won't go anywhere.
Brekk