Syobon wrote:
Quote:
Being stubborn's wrong, right; but... why should I doubt about something for every single person who's going to say I'm wrong ? As long as they can't at least explain to me why I'm wrong, I shouldn't think I'm wrong.
You're right in that there is no reason to assume you're wrong when no decent counter arguments have been presented, but a person who wants to find out the truth (big word, but I mean it in the literal sense that applies to anything), and who doesn't just want to win the argument, doubts his own theories and beliefs as well, in the sense that he applies the same demand of justification from them as he demands from other theories and beliefs.
That's right; when I want to prove myself wrong, I try to find reasons; but that still means I presented myself with counterarguments, actually... I kinda told myself "wait, there [A], but when [B] happens, then [C]... would that actually mean that [D] ?"
It is useful to doubt, we always have to doubt, to wonder if we're right or not; but when it has a
use. When there is something that tells us "what if ?..."
If there isn't even the slightest "what if ?...", why doubt ?
It's like, if you tell me "I saw a duck holding two knives and a gun and shooting and murdering dogs while performing kung-fu !"... why should I even doubt and wonder "well maybe he's right".
And sometimes, yes, some thoughts are full of shit and don't even deserve to be looked at -EXCEPT if they have some king of weight.
A thought that has no weight can't make one doubtful.