AWKWARD ZOMBIE

Brek was also suspicious yesterday for casting doubt on the possibility that the Mafia was protecting Darkin... and since Darkin was the fair lass...

I think we have too many possible leads with nothing conclusive. We need to find one person to band around.

In the meantime, please, those of you that have voted, take your votes off of IO. We already know thar be pirate.

Besides, no one wants to be rid of the grog.

Did Need Runes ever confirm that he was accosted by the drunken pirate? I know Noff confirmed that he was, but Runes didn't say about it yet.

Also, change my vote to undecided, I need time to think about this again.

Oh yeah, sorry, had a great party, with blackjack, and hookers. fished up the fair lass & everything

lynch everyone, i saw. arr.

but actually i am little suspicious on angel. idk the 1000% think seemed like she's trying to protect noff, who could be a fellow mafia member. so for right now i'm undecided but leaning towards angel or noff

and now we all learned a valuable lesson today

DMs should always send everybody their rum regardless of night action, and i like to party B)

So you say you got the fair lass AND the booze lady at your place night one?
Lucky guy.

Runes is really good at beer pong

Arrrrr this is confusing I don't know who to lynch now arrrrr.

My mind arrr twisted in unexpected ways
NO LYNCH for now

If I voted for E Goat would that still make me guilty?

throw EGoat Overboard.

Really? I pointed out Darkin's story as completely ridiculous with no foundation or motive of any kind, got no response, and now I'm guilty for protecting Noffle? How?

The whole issue surrounding the booze has me a little confused and I would appreciate clarification from Sol Reaper, if at all possible?

As for my vote, I can barely decide. I will vote No Lynch due to shortage of time and lack of anything concrete in the ways of evidence.

You really have it out for me, don't you?

I never said or implied that Darkin was innocent. I said I didn't want to lynch him just because his name was the first to be thrown out as a lynch.

As for Occam's razor, it applies even more to a mafia game than science. In science, you actually have evidence. Here, gut instinct and wording on an internet forum is all you have to go by.

TBH. If you want to go for someone suspicious, I think D-Vid is the one to go for. He swapped votes constantly yesterday and he doesn't seem to be any less suspicious now by going directly for Noff. I'll give him credit for calling IO though.

Undecided

Occam's Razor states that the answer with the fewest assumptions is often the most likely.

Why was the conclusion that IO was a dirty mafia lying about being the Drunken Sailor and trying implicate "innocent" Noff as part of Darkin's scheme more likely than IO telling the truth and being unsure whether to trust Noff based on Darkin's reaction?

At the very least you could have waited for Runes to confirm whether he got a drink, but instead you voted to off IO quickly.

I'm not convinced enough yet that you're guilty to set a lynch against you (IO seemed kinda suspicious but ended up innocent), but right now out of everyone, you're making me feel the most uneasy.

This is my train of thought:

"Evidence" for Noff being mutineer:
Noff points finger at Darkin -> Darkin claims Noff didn't follow mutineer discussion -> Noff not stopping lynch early enough -> Noff starting a bandwagon

"Evidence" for Noff being a pirate:
Noff points finger at Darkin -> Darkin gets keelhauled and is mutineer

"Evidence" for IO being a mutineer:
Follows weak "Noff being mutineer" chain -> Ignores fairly obvious innocent chain -> Asks who got drunk the last night to bolster her accusation

"Evidence" for IO being a pirate:
Claims drunken pirate role -> Gets confirmation later

It's worth noting that I didn't think IO would actually get backed up and I also posted at the same time as her. I didn't have time to sit through any discussion as I had to run to work right afterwards. I followed my gut feeling at that time and I guess it was wrong. I don't think IO is a mutineer and I removed my vote for her when I got home. Tell me, how is this suspicious to you?

On D-Vid. He flipped votes often during the first day. He votes for Darkin before the bandwagon really takes off, then he votes no-lynch soon after. Then he goes back to Darkin when the bandwagon really starts. This day he immediately points his finger to Noff. Afterwards he claims that he is sure IO is not mutineer and is correct. If this isn't suspicious to anybody, then I don't know what is.