AWKWARD ZOMBIE

Sounds a little weird considering an answer of "yes" would have been worth just as much of your word as an answer of "no". Though were I the interrogator it would probably lead me to question you anyway on the weird nature of your answer...

Can the interrogator get ahold of some duct tape to shut Reyo up?

Or is Reyo the interrogator?

If that's the case I feel bad for the wardens.

Or you can try to figure out whodunit. I only started clammering my skull cave because the head warden got antsy that we weren't doing anything, and me, marcato, and giraffe have been the only ones figuring said whodunit out.

Which is awfully strange if we're to take into account previous mafia actions in previous mafia games. Aren't YOU traditionally the voice of detectivey reason?

(also, this isn't meta gaming? This sounds awfully meta, why DID we delve into the realm of "Reyo never/always acts like that!"?)

Ugh, this is going nowhere.
I change my vote to No Lynch.

I'd like to remind you that you only have until tomorrow.
If there's no decision until then...
well, I wouldn't want to be one of you if there's no decision until then.

i think you might have the best plan here

by that i mean it's a really shitty plan but it's better than the rest because at least you have some kind of notion of what is happening

but who were you thinking specifically to lynch

I've already provided juicy information that puts me in the spot of being neither mafia or warden, namely that I've been hooked and interrogated on different Nights. This logically leaves me as typical prisoner.

I can't, however, defend the others being accused, but I'm not sure how far you'll get. However, even a failure of a lynch can provide a nugget of truth.

unless, of course, you're lying?

i mean, i believe you, but it wouldn't be the hardest thing ever to lie in this game
it's kind of built around it

well so far no one has stepped up to contradict his claim so i think he's golden.

unless someone wants to take the golden away from hiiim???

Better men than you have tried, dirtbag.

Well if someone else was, in fact, hooked, there'd be no reason for them to withold it, so I believe that. And even then, were you still lying, the hooker would then have reason to kill you tonight since there'd be no reason for an innocent to lie about that sort of thing.

Now the interrogator is one that's slightly more complicated. There are numerous ways to get around that...maybe the guy they DID interrogate turned on the prisoners/mafia, and wouldn't want his name down as "People who were interrogated" to give himself some plausible deniability later on. Maybe the interrogator decided to not interrogate anybody. Either one leaves room for you to come in and say "Yeah, guys, I was totes interrogated. Shit sucked." This is probably something I would do, or in the very least introduce as an idea, since any faction party in this game will need their odd man out, like the one mafia member the rest of the mafia throws under the bus to look innocent...except this would be the opposite of that. To make sure they have one guy left that everyone trusts, even if the rest of them go down in a blaze of shivs and PANK slips.

I'm not saying that this is what happened...just that it's very possible.

Unless someone else wants to come forth and admit to experiencing a less-than-conjugal visit from the proper authorites?

Also, just for reference, tomorrow will be another "epic driving adventure" day, so I'll be incapacitated for most of the day tomorrow. Just so nobody interprets my sudden vow of silence as suspicious behavior.

You're forgetting the option that I was interrogated and switched sides, slick.

But then coming forward with the fact that they approached me and volunteering that theory wouldn't be too smart either, eh champ?

Not particularly, but it would help assert the point that no one is really proven innocent yet. Just some more innocent than others......

I did see a plan forming, thugh, namely one that involves a lynch, one where we lynch an individual from a group of "me, [you], and a few other people." Who are these "few other people"? Do we have a soecific list, or was it just a way to note the two of us not getting along? And, especially, does the person who suggested it fit into that list of "a few other people" humself, or was he just throwing the lot of us under the bus? I'm more than pop flyin' to throw myself under the bus, but you realize how easy it'd be to swoop in while people are having a disagreement and say "Hey guys, why don't we try lynching one of these guys?"

Especially if you were the bad guys, and knew for a fact they were both innocent.

Guy 1 gets lynched, shows up as prisoner.
"OMG that means guy 2 was a bad guy!"
Guy 2 gets lynched, shows up as prisoner.
"I just don't know what went wrong..."

The moral of the story being that just because we're having a disagreement, it doesn't automatically mean we're on different sides. It means we don't know the other's allegiance.

though, it would still serve the purpose of clearing things up

just not favorably

but at this point we don't really have favorable options