AWKWARD ZOMBIE

haha what, people post about menstruation and etc etc but my story of speaking to somebody i fancy is xxxrated?

Too hot for AZ.

Love IS menstruation!

also

Being on antibiotics sucks. I have to be really careful because any fart could be diarrhea.

that moment when you want to post gay porn on the internet but you realise people you know will see it

my life is so difficult you guys don't even know

hasn't stopped anyone else yet

Oh god.

Rule 63 flashbacks.

No FemKamina. NOOOOOOOOOOOO.

I have posted Pokemon pr0n on the internet - with my name on it.

There may be more to come as well.

you make it sound like this isnt something we've come to expect from you

although, technically speaking, a lot of people consider artistic nude to be porn? i dont know quite how far off the deep end you've gone
no fish puns intended

I haven't posted any sexual contact work yet (i.e. between two characters), just what might be described as individual nudes.

the operative words being "posted" and "yet"
but yeah you know what i mean. then again when you start delving into the aesthetic relativism scene the lines between "art" and "definitely not art" are nonexistent
the argument being of course that porn is art, too, but having to take into account general standards of decency as well as ~kiddies on the internet~ it also isnt

I'm generally not interested in arguing about whether or not illustrated adult material is art.

It's a meaningless argument if only because one person's art is another's grafitti, etc. etc. etc. etc.

DnD I always read your posts with a disaproving voice. o w o

That's probably Death the Kid's disapproving glare doing the talking.

Your stuffs on paheal, so its pretty much rule34 porn.

I don't like that dA features photography at all. I think it would be better for the site to have a split interface to stem - or at least redirect - the flow of that kind of material.

I generally don't care a whole lot for photography - not that I discount it as an artistic medium - I just think the way that dA throws it all in with the art on the site isn't the best way to do it.



I don't understand this apparent mutual exclusivity.

How is it that an admittedly intentional adult piece of work is not also considered a piece of art?

Artistic skill and talent went into making it - an understanding of colour, line, proportion, tone, composition - all the same components that go into any other piece of work, so why the snobbery?

I have heard it said that for a piece to be considered 'art' it needs to evoke some kind of emotional response - is not arousal or disgust an emotional response?

I have heard it said that for a piece to be considered 'art' it needs to evoke discussion - what is it we are doing right now?

Artwork has long featured nudity and sexual connotation - from classical Roman statues all the way through to modern pop art.