AWKWARD ZOMBIE

Not yet. Not enough info has been presented, and I can't base much around two deaths. I'm gonna keep monitoring activity throughout the game. (unless I die, which is highly likely)

Honestly I'd rather continue to NOT lynch anyone. For a few reasons.

A) The Clockmaker has to be careful. They can't hit a 6 at any cost, and both Tales and Madican were villagers. They've got 2 "hours" already, and if they continue to kill randomly and get two villagers, or really any combination of people without being careful, they die. Because of that, they have to kill very carefully, and make sure their targets won't make them die as well. So they won't be killing every night.

B) The Granny only kills if someone visits them. As long as you're checking your visits you should be fine.

That just leaves the Mafia, and while they will kill someone once every night if they're smart, that SHOULD be it. One person a night. Not three.
We don't have much reason to make a panic vote, in that scenario. There's the chance that The Clockmaker is a complete idiot and doesn't check their targets, and someone visits The Granny every game, but it's a smallish chance.

I'm not gonna make a panic vote that could kill someone important. Staying No Lynch.

I wasn't here. I JUST got home.

I apologize for going out to eat.
I don't know how to contribute yet. But I will try.

In the meantime , My vote is LUNCH SPAM

How could anyone 'check their visits'? No one has any idea who the Granny is. Does that mean no power roles should do their thing, just in case? The Clockmaker won't just stop killing because he thinks he'll die, he would lose anyway. We need to start thinning the suspects.

By the way, instead of contributing, Runes4 just voted to kill the first guy who suspected him. That's not suspicious.

By "contributing," I mean "trying to help the town in any way".

Well at the same time it kinda makes you suspicious, but you have a point.

I dunno, I'm staying with No Lynch until there's something a bit more suspicious.

It wasn't that, I... I change to No Lynch.

Suspicious as hell, right?

We don't have a Fool role.

In any other scenario, where the Fool existed, you would have just sort of proven yourself as one there, Runes. It bodaciously seems like you WANT to die. You're asking for it pretty hard, almost.

As there isn't a Fool, it's awkward as hell posting and yeah that seems pretty suspicious.

Lynch Runes.

I'm having some suspicions, but I'd rather wait it out today before I actually act on it.

Runes seems to be digging himself into a hole. Lynching the first person who suspects him and switching votes really, really quickly. I vote for no lynch again, since I honestly can't see anything happening this day, but I'm watching you, Runes.

I don't know how to defend myself, I have no power, I can't even make up my mind sometimes. I apologise, SPAM, for acting as I had, It was a mistake, and not only because I am at a risk. I was planning to add an apology, but got a little caught up.

As for contribution, I can say nothing other than that sompartsareme has no evidence against me other than that I don't post too much. I may have been on-line, but Chrome was open in the task-bar while Noffletoff and I played some Heroes of Might and Magic.

I'm saying we need to lynch someone today, and we should choose someone who doesn't contribute often. In the past 2 games, all you usually did was vote no lynch at the very beginning of the day. And then you put the nail in your own coffin by acting scummy.

Oh, really?



If this was a video game, I'd say that was a contradiction right there. If you JUST got home, then how could you be playing video games?

You're more suspicious than a kid with cookie crumbs on his face saying he didn't eat any.

You got me for trying to hel. You JUST said we needed to lynch someone and I needed to contribute. I realized I had erred by going out of my element and jumping to conclusions. But I was trying to play this time.

You got me for trying to HELP
***