AWKWARD ZOMBIE

Granny started the wagon.
Alec jumped on it immediately.
Lotharu didn't really claim a good reason beside "this day is taking too long".
Mr. Fuzznut kinda only voted for the hell of it too.

Now Lotharu mentioned Granny. This could be because he's either genuinely suspicious of him or because he's scum trying to get a cheap lynch on someone who looks suspicious anyway.

Also, Grey Fox STILL didn't get a kill. I'm beginning to believe he's getting hooked every night because running into a doctor is rather unlikely. But if so, why don't mafia just kill him and use their hooker to stop someone else?

There are multiple possibilities with that. Maybe banter was a grey fox kill, and the mafia actually tried to kill who the doctor saved. We can't be too sure just what life saving mechanism actually came into play last night.

Also, I actually like the idea of taking the granny votes into consideration. It does seem like those votes were just swept under the rug. Maybe we can use both the dzelda votes and granny votes to kinda narrow down the suspect pool (if it's applicable, I actually don't know how well the two actually coencide).

That may happen once, but 3 times in a row coincidentally having one of them run into the doc?

Maybe a combination of the things?

Also, D-Vid, to clarify when I jumped on the bandwagon, I was typing up my post to start the bandwagon when I saw Benson had already started it.

But yes. The Grey-Fox kill might make more sense, because of peoples' suspicion of Banter. It doesn't make much sense that the Mafia would kill one of the few individuals who were potentially suspicious.

While highly unlikely, it's still theoretically possible.

Is the doctor notified if he successfully protects a patient?

All I know for sure is the person the doctor protects gets notified when he's protected...

...also I was saved by the doctor last night...

...and the night before...

...if that means someone's trying to kill me, please don't...

I only mentioned the Benson votes because it seemed kinda weird to me how a couple people voted, but then everyone just seemed to completely ignore even the possibility to vote for him.

That's one of the reasons why I suspected him. He indirectly accused dzelda and then just let the bandwagon form.

Then again, someone ganked him last night and he was innocent, so. It's not exactly a foolproof piece of evidence to go on. The best bet at this point is to look at who did vote for dzelda, and base our suspicions on that. For one, there's a very good chance that there's at least one foxhound in that list, and for two it is why dzelda went through with his shenanigans in the first place.

I already listed my suspicions based on what happened.

Wait, didn't Banter get ganked last night?

Yes......yes he did.

I'm still really suspicious of Granny, especially after looking back at all of his/her posts. He/she just ignores the arguments about whether to lynch Dzelda or not, opting to crack wise or say Dzelda's being too defensive. It feels like he/she more wanted to keep people gunning for Dzelda instead of acknowledging the conversation (to the point of ignoring two votes against him/her and keeping the focus on Dzelda).

I'm positive there's more FOXHOUND that voted against Dzelda as well, but the one that pops out the most from the last day is Granny Benson, to me at least. I'm open to discussion first before any lynching gets tossed around though, we don't want to repeat mistakes.