AWKWARD ZOMBIE

The "story" was the Cultists' quest to quell their Eldritch monster.

That story is now over.

Youre on my suspicious wall now.

I think he was talking about the,"we" he used, when it was the mafia who killed him, not the town. Implying the we was unintentional because he actually had a part in the killing.
Pretty suspicious, but I'm sticking with guyperson.

I think that was probably a simple slip of words. I almost made a similar mistake until I reworded my sentence.
I don't think Madican is guilty for it.

Also, Supaaku, you seem to be trying to draw attention away from guyperson by only just now presenting this. Such a quick lyncher, too.

Everyone is on everyone's suspicion wall. This is day one.

I still hold to my vote however.

I also find it odd how people are rushing to quash the only vote against Madican, when my reasoning for voting for him is much the same as everyone else's reasoning for voting for Guyperson.

One vote doesn't make a lynch.

idk guys, last time we did a random vote it was in our benefit, but guyperson seems sincere.
If by chance he is a mafia he is pretty lucky that the real salesman hasnt said anything.
and if he is a townsperson. I'm gonna be suspicious of flicky for essentially railroading guy.

First Sax is suspicious for trying to get us away from voting, then I'm suspicious for saying Sax is up to something, then anyone who defends me is suspicious, yet flicky, who accuses all these people except Sax of suspicion, is not suspicious beyond normal.
The only one I think isn't suspicious is Madican, who still got called out on suspicion of being suspicious.

As bizarre as your accusations may be, they are no more concrete than any of the others.
Day one presents evidence only to the cop, and even then only if he visits a guilty person.
I was going to go with the norm as a standby until something turned up, as I see it has.
You are acting just a little too edgy right now, pardner.

Be that as it may, there is just as little evidence surrounding you, and everyone else, as there is me.

Keeping No-Lynch vote.

Okay, here's the thing people. You've been playing these games because you had roles that gave you evidence. But in this game? There is none. You will never have evidence. Nothing, zip, nada. You've got a cop who will hopefully lay low and try to influence votes with his information about guilty/innocent but you also have a cop who'll be doing the same thing except always innocent. First time I've seen a role that screws the townies over inherently.

There will never be any evidence. Gut lynching is your best and only option.

I shall switch my vote to LYNCH FLICKY.

Not voting yet cause I'm tired and can't be assed to find logic for first day lynchings.

Uch, we really aren't getting anywhere. I can't really see anything that is particularly scummy; I guess there's too many accusations in the air.
I change my vote to No Lynch. I'll keep my finger pointed at Guyperson, though. Could still very well be gang member.

ANYONE could very well be a gang member. Guyperson seems kind of suspicious now I guess, but only because so many others have voice suspicion towards him.

Keeping my vote at no lynch for now.

I suppose if we end this day we can get the cop's report the next day, but I'm worried about who they'll get. But it's not like my vote will get across today if I don't go for no lynch, so I'll go for NO LYNCH.

I'm still suspicious of guyperson, but it's becoming obvious that it'll be impossible to lynch people today.

No Lynch.