AWKWARD ZOMBIE

usually not funny
It is currently Wed Nov 26, 2025 6:47 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1027 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 69  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 6:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 12:12 pm
Posts: 12220
Location: Thinking.
Syobon wrote:
Inbreeding is bad because every creature carries a bunch of recessive genes that can cause malfunctions and diseases. If they breed with creatures with similar genes(relatives) this increases the likelihood they get more copies of the same recessive genes (become homozygote for that gene) and thus those recessive genes can be expressed and cause shit.

Kinda like excessive mutations, huh?

You're arguing against the likelihood of inbreeding causing mutations with a comment saying that inbreeding causes more frequent mutations.

Self-contradiction; If I was in a courtroom I would shout "OBJECTION!"


Granted, some of the mutations would be damaging, but also there's the possibility that some of the mutations might be beneficial - if anything the heightened gene activity dynamic caused by inbreeding would be more likely to give rise to genetic errors such as chromosomal duplication - said chromosomes being redundant for a while until further mutations occur.

_________________
donotdelete.deviantart.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 6:34 am 
Offline
+4 to defense
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:34 am
Posts: 15027
DoNotDelete wrote:
Kinda like excessive mutations, huh?

You're arguing against the likelihood of inbreeding causing mutations with a comment saying that inbreeding causes more frequent mutations.


Self-contradiction; If I was in a courtroom I would shout OBJECTION!


Recombination of genes causing two homozygote recessive alleles on the same locus to pair and become expressed is not the same as mutation. Recessive alleles are suppressed by corresponding dominant alleles for a gene, thus allowing a creature to become a genetic carrier for a trait without it having that trait it self. Mutation is a random process that can be promoted by a number of factors, but inbreeding is not one of them according to me, and Wikipedia seems to agree.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 6:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 12:12 pm
Posts: 12220
Location: Thinking.
From the same page:

Wikipedia wrote:
Some inbreeding may enhance fertility rate

A recent study in Iceland by the deCODE genetics company, published by the journal Science, found that third cousins produced more children and grandchildren, suggesting that "in spite of the fact that bringing together two alleles of a recessive trait may be bad, there is clearly some biological wisdom in the union of relatively closely related people.". For hundreds of years, inbreeding was historically unavoidable in Iceland due to its then tiny and isolated population.

So inbreeding isn't *always* bad.


Syobon wrote:
Recombination of genes causing two homozygote recessive alleles on the same locus to pair and become expressed is not the same as mutation. Recessive alleles are suppressed by corresponding dominant alleles for a gene, thus allowing a creature to become a genetic carrier for a trait without it having that trait it self.

I understand that, but it doesn't necessarily counter the point I was trying to make.

I'm trying to argue that inbreeding - with all the recessive alleles and gene duplicates flying around - would give rise to more replication errors where genes become deleted or reorganised or cloned as the cells of a sexually mature adult enter the meiosis phase - this effect being magnified by closely-related creatures interbreeding.

I'm just trying to establish a scenario where extra chromosomes *might* be formed, because new chromosomes denote new species, and new species are formed in isolation - where a given population may be small in number, suggesting inbreeding *may* be a factor in the formation of new chromosomes.

That's the train of thought I'm trying to convey.

_________________
donotdelete.deviantart.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Wed May 11, 2011 7:14 am 
Offline
+4 to defense
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:34 am
Posts: 15027
DoNotDelete wrote:
So inbreeding isn't *always* bad.


That's interesting, but I still think the downsides outweigh the benefits in a natural evolutional process. It has some application in controlled breeding apparently.

DoNotDelete wrote:
I'm trying to argue that inbreeding - with all the recessive alleles and gene duplicates flying around - would give rise to more replication errors where genes become deleted or reorganised or cloned as the cells of a sexually mature adult enter the meiosis phase - this effect being magnified by closely-related creatures interbreeding.


It may increase the chance of replication errors, but not with such a significant amount that it can be regarded as the sole explanation for evolutionary divergence. Inbreeding generally leads to a decrease in ecological fitness which would hinder the reproduction of the new species, and thus evening out and probably overtaking the advantage of increased replication errors.

What you're trying to do, finding an explanation in gene replication mechanisms to explain the forming or deletion of new chromosomes isn't necessary. Like any mutation, there are plenty of factors that can induce it and through probability and natural selection the process is explained. Evolutionary divergence may to some extent be influenced by inbreeding, but it certainly isn't the sole explaining factor.

And then I read through your post again and realise that might be what you're saying, whoops. Our argument may boil down to what extent inbreeding is a factor then. Well, according to me it isn't a main one, but I won't lose any sleep over it if you believe otherwise.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:08 pm 
Offline
Master of Puppets
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 23439
Location: i'm the only hell mama ever raised
Necro time. I'm taking Biology this summer and it's turning out to be much more interesting than I thought it would be. Cellular respiration and photosynthesis are totally symmetrical and it's blowing my mind.

_________________
Quote:
The A in this case stands for Armageddon. As in, Armageddon a boner because this plane has a fucking HOWITZER sticking out of it.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:20 pm 
Offline
+4 to defense
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:34 am
Posts: 15027
Are you referring to the exchange of CO2 through stomata in plants with cellular respiration? Or the oxidation in mitochondria? I could look it up on wikipedia of course, but it's fun trying to figure out the English terms.

Also, is that extra summer classes you're taking, or are those part of the normal curricula?

Edit: woops, that sentence sucked.


Last edited by Syobon on Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:25 pm 
Offline
Master of Puppets
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 23439
Location: i'm the only hell mama ever raised
Both. For cellular respiration, oxygen and glucose become carbon dioxide, water, and energy; in photosynthesis carbon dioxide, water, and energy become oxygen and glucose. It's like the process just gets reversed between plants and animals, though I know both processes are complicated and involve multiple other chemicals.

Anyway, this is just a filler class I'm taking with others to get scholarship cheddar.

By the way, I'm having fun drawing diagrams of all these processes in my notebook, if I had a scanner I'd upload them.

_________________
Quote:
The A in this case stands for Armageddon. As in, Armageddon a boner because this plane has a fucking HOWITZER sticking out of it.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:30 pm 
Offline
+4 to defense
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 10:34 am
Posts: 15027
Oh in that way. It becomes even more interesting when you add carnivores and detrivores, then you get the synergy in Nitrogen intake (through proteins and such).

Where are you currently in the educational system Exeres? And what are you going to study next year?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Wed Jun 08, 2011 3:33 pm 
Offline
Master of Puppets
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 23439
Location: i'm the only hell mama ever raised
College. Like I said, this was pretty much just an elective for me. I'm actually a history major, I only need one Western Civilization class to graduate but I can't take it until next semester. I'm going to try to get a few more classes from the same teacher, the guy is great.

_________________
Quote:
The A in this case stands for Armageddon. As in, Armageddon a boner because this plane has a fucking HOWITZER sticking out of it.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:13 am
Posts: 5027
Location: Ministry of Truth
Gravity is caused by space flowing into objects with mass.
There is space flowing into you and the earth and black holes. Like water in a current toward a waterfall.
The flow of space is what causes certain things to move. Like galaxies.
This blew my mind when we covered it in astronomy.
Also there are Gamma Rays getting to earth that were created at the beginning of the universe.
Imagine if you were that gamma ray. You finally get free from the primordial soup and start traveling. 14 billion years later you finally reach your destination. The destination and the entirity of the scenery along the trip didn't even exist when you left. Like boarding a plane from LA to New York. Except New York doesn't exist when the plane takes off neither does the land between the two. They only start to shortly before you get there.

IDK it was freaking me out earlier.

_________________
TheOtherMC:
"Snarf tiddies dont work like that"

Trygve was here.
Spoony was here.

Snarf - 6 World - 1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:24 pm 
Offline
Master of Puppets
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 23439
Location: i'm the only hell mama ever raised
Snarf, you have seen the Universe. You want something even freakier? Those gamma rays have been traveling at the speed of light since the Big Bang, and since time is relative to motion, from the perspective of the gamma ray no time has passed at all. Just an instant between Bang and destination. 14 billion years, in the blink of an eye.

_________________
Quote:
The A in this case stands for Armageddon. As in, Armageddon a boner because this plane has a fucking HOWITZER sticking out of it.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:13 am
Posts: 5027
Location: Ministry of Truth
I KNOW MAN!
ITS SO FREAKING CRAZY
:science:
ARALKRJKLSDJGLFSDJFFFF

_________________
TheOtherMC:
"Snarf tiddies dont work like that"

Trygve was here.
Spoony was here.

Snarf - 6 World - 1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:27 pm
Posts: 7153
Location: Kangs Prak
Snarf wrote:
Gravity is caused by space flowing into objects with mass.

How can space move? It is the definition of nothing.
But I do understand what you meant, I prefer the fabric analogy though.

What is incredible is the theories on why the big bang happened. 2 colliding dimensions, anyone?

_________________
ImageImage


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:32 pm 
Offline
Master of Puppets
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:11 pm
Posts: 23439
Location: i'm the only hell mama ever raised
FUCK YEAR.


Attachments:
Science.png
Science.png [ 90.42 KiB | Viewed 902 times ]

_________________
Quote:
The A in this case stands for Armageddon. As in, Armageddon a boner because this plane has a fucking HOWITZER sticking out of it.

Image
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Science is interesting
PostPosted: Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 12:13 am
Posts: 5027
Location: Ministry of Truth
Stranaton wrote:
Snarf wrote:
Gravity is caused by space flowing into objects with mass.

How can space move? It is the definition of nothing.
But I do understand what you meant, I prefer the fabric analogy though.

What is incredible is the theories on why the big bang happened. 2 colliding dimensions, anyone?


Space moves by moving toward objects with mass. I don't remember all the details.


On a related note.
I visited LIGO, it is a facility in my hometown. One of the very few in the world.
It is trying to detect gravitational waves. These come from massive things like neutron stars with binary companions and blackholes with binary companions and interacting neutron stars. Detecting them is very difficult and the instruments they use are extremely sensitive. They can pick up storms in Alaska from here in Washington and the sound of waves on the beach hundreds of miles away. Their device is in a L shape and is several km long in both directions. They detect a change in the time it takes light to come back. They send out a light beam using a laser. Gravitational waves will cause one arm to get longer and one to get shorter. But only by a very very very small margin (like the width of a quark or proton, I can't remember). The light beam is shot off into each of the two arms and then is reflected back. If they come back correctly they should arrive at the same time and there should be destructive interference and there will be nothing or very close to nothing on the viewing screen. If there is something that means the arms changed size and the light came back at different times proving gravitational waves existence. However the mirrors they reflect with are so sensitive that even trucks on the highway can disturb it enough to offset the results. That is why they compare with several other LIGOs around the world to determine if they had similar results. Unfortunetly it was shut down because they are upgrading and making even larger arms that are like double the length. Allowing them to detect even smaller length changes. It takes years though and probably won't be ready until 2015.

Knowing gravitational waves existence will allow them to determine their speed through space and help them to detect sources of the waves and many other amazing things.

_________________
TheOtherMC:
"Snarf tiddies dont work like that"

Trygve was here.
Spoony was here.

Snarf - 6 World - 1


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1027 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 69  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 41 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group